An interchange format for optical music recognition applications

Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 51-56

  Hankinson, Andrew ^a   Pugin, Laurent ^b   Fujinaga, Ichiro ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL COMPONENT; DIGITAL REPRESENTATIONS; INTERCHANGE FORMATS; LAYOUT INFORMATION; MUSIC NOTATION; MUSICAL INFORMATION; OPTICAL MUSIC RECOGNITION;

SEMANTICS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84873591058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Blostein, D., and L. Haken. 1991. Justification of printed music. Communications of the ACM 34 (3): 88-99.
2. Warmington, F. 1999. A survey of scribal hands in the manuscripts. In The treasury of Petrus Alamire: Music and art in Flemish court manuscripts 1500- 1535, ed. H. Kellman, 41-52. Amsterdam: Ludion Ghent.
3. Luth, N. 2002. Automatic identification of music notations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Delivering of Music (WEDELMUSIC), 203-10.
4. Hall, P. 1997. A view of Berg's Lulu through the autograph sources. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Google Books. http://books.google.com [Accessed 23 March 2010].
6. Internet Archive. http://www.archive.org [Accessed 23 March 2010].
7. Schubert Autographs. http://www.schubertonline.at/activpage/index-en.htm [Accessed 23 March 2010].
8. Digital Image Archive of Medieval Music. http://www.diamm.ac.uk [Accessed 23 March 2010].
9. The Computerized Mensural Music Editing Project. http://www.cmme.org [Accessed 23 March 2010].
10. Breuel, T. M., and U. Kaiserslautern. 2007. The hOCR microformat for OCR workflow and results. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 1063- 7.
11. hOCR-tools. http://code.google.com/p/hocr-tools [Accessed 23 March 2009].
12. Celartem/Lizartech DjVu format reference. http://djvu.org/docs/DjVu3Spec. djvu [Accessed 23 March 2010].
13. The BagIt File Packaging Format. https://svn.tools.ietf.org/html/draft- kunze-bagit-04 [Accessed 23 March 2010].
14. Tabata, K., T. Okada, M. Nagamori, T. Sakaguchi, and S. Sugimoto. 2005. A collaboration model between archival systems to enhance the reliability of preservation by an enclose-and-deposit method. In Proceedings of the International Web Archiving Workshop.
15. Castan, G. 2009. NIFF. http://www.musicnotation.info/en/formats/NIFF. html. [Accessed 29 May 2010].
16. Jones, G. OMR engine output file format. http://www.visiv.co.uk/tech-mro. htm [Accessed 29 May 2010].
17. Kurth, F., D. Damm, C. Fremerey, M. Müller, and M. Clausen. 2008. A framework for managing multimodal digitized music collections. In Research and advanced technology for digital libraries, 334-45. Berlin: Springer.
18. Good, M. 2009. Using MusicXML 2.0 for music editorial applications. In Digitale Edition zwischen Experiment und Standardisierung, ed. P. Stadler and J. Veit, 157-74. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
19. Barton, L. 2002. The NEUMES project: Digital transcription of medieval chant manuscripts. In Proceedings of the Web Delivering of Music (WEDELMUSIC), 211-8.
20. Roland, P. 2009. MEI as an editorial music standard. In Digitale Edition zwischen Experiment und Standardisierung, ed. P. Stadler and J. Veit, 175-94. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
21. Riley, J., and I. Fujinaga. 2003. Recommended best practices for digital image capture of musical scores. OCLC Systems and Services 19 (2): 62-9.
22. Glossary of terms used by the NEUMES project. http://www.scribeserver. com/NEUMES/help/glossary.htm [Accessed 23 March 2010].
23. Barton, L., J. Caldwell, and P. Jeavons. 2005. Elibrary of medieval chant manuscript transcriptions. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 320-39.
24. Fujinaga, I. 1997. Adaptive optical music recognition. PhD diss., McGill University.
25. Pugin, L., J. Burgoyne, and I. Fujinaga. 2007. Reducing costs for digitising early music with dynamic adaptation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL), 471-4.
26. Hankinson, A. 2010. PyBagIt 1.0 documentation. http://www.musiclibs.net/ pybagit [Accessed 29 May 2010].