Databionic visualization of music collections according to perceptual distance

ISMIR 2005 - 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 396-403

  Mörchen, Fabian ^a   Ultsch, Alfred ^a   Nöcker, Mario ^a   Stamm, Christian ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Audio features; Clustering; Music similarity; Perception; Visualization

Indexed keywords

AUDIO DATA; AUDIO FEATURES; CLUSTERING; EMERGENT STRUCTURE; FEATURE VECTORS; HIGH-LEVEL FEATURES; LARGE MUSIC COLLECTIONS; LOW LEVEL; LOW-LEVEL FEATURES; MINING TECHNIQUES; MUSIC COLLECTION; MUSIC SIMILARITY; MUSICAL GENRE; NON-REDUNDANT; PERCEPTUAL DISTANCE; SHORT TIME WINDOWS; SOUND SPACES; TOPOGRAPHIC MAP;

AUDIO RECORDINGS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; FLOW VISUALIZATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MAPS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VISUALIZATION;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

EID: 84873562110     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook. Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5), 2002.
2. J.J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. Representing musical genre: a state of art. JNMR, 31(1), 2003.
3. F. Mörchen, A. Ultsch, Michael Thies, Ingo Löhken, Mario Nöcker, Christian Stamm, Niko Efthymiou, and Martin Kümmerer. MusicMiner: Visualizing timbre distances of music as topograpical maps. Technical Report 47, CS Department, Philipps- University Marburg, Germany, 2005.
4. A. Ultsch. Self-organizing neural networks for visualization and classification. In Proc. GfKl, Dortmund, Germany, 1992.
5. T. Kohonen. Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, 1995.
6. A. Ultsch. Maps for the Visualization of high dimensional Data Spaces. In Proc. WSOM, Hibikino, Japan, 2003.
7. B. Logan and A. Salomon. A music similarity function based on signal analysis. In IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, page 190, 2001.
8. J.-J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. Finding songs that sound the same. In Proc. of IEEE Benelux Workshop on Model based Processing and Coding of Audio, 2002.
9. Jean-Julien Aucouturier and Francois Pachet. Tools and architecture for the evaluation of similarity measures: case study of timbre similarity. In Proc. ISMIR, 2004.
10. E. Pampalk, S. Dixon, and G. Widmer. On the evaluation of perceptual similarity measures for music. In Proc. DAFX, 2003.
11. D. Ellis, B. Whitman, A. Berenzweig, and S. Lawrence. The quest for ground truth in musical artist similarity. In Proc. ISMIR, 2002.
12. David Bainbridge, Sally Jo Cunningham, and J. Stephen Downie. Visual collaging of music in a digital library. In Proc. ISMIR, 2004.
13. Fabio Vignoli, Rob van Gulik, and Huub van deWetering. Mapping music in the palm of your hand, explore and discover your collection. In Proc. ISMIR, 2004.
14. Marc Torrens, Patrick Hertzog, and Josep Lluis Arcos. Visualizing and exploring personal music libraries. In Proc. ISMIR, 2004.
15. P. Cano, M. Kaltenbrunner, F. Gouyon, and E. Battle. On the use of fastmap for audio retrieval and browsing. In Proc. ISMIR, 2002.
16. G. Tzanetakis, A. Ermolinskyi, and P. Cook. Beyond the query-by-example paradigm: New query interfaces for music. In Proc. Int. Computer Music Conference, 2002.
17. E. Pampalk, A. Rauber, and D. Merkl. Contentbased organization and visualization of music archives. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, pages 570.579. ACM, 2002.
18. A. Ultsch. Self organizing neural networks perform different from statistical k-means clustering. In Proc. GfKl, Basel, Suisse, 1995.
19. A. Ultsch and F. Mörchen. ESOM-Maps: tools for clustering, visualization, and classification with Emergent SOM. Technical Report 46, CS Department, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany, 2005.
20. A. Ultsch. Pareto Density Estimation: Probability Density Estimation for Knowledge Discovery. In Proc. GfKl, Cottbus, Germany, 2003.
21. A. Ultsch. U*-Matrix: A Tool to visualize Clusters in high dimensional Data. Technical Report 36, CS Department, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany, 2004.
22. E. Pampalk, S. Dixon, and G. Widmer. Exploring music collections by browsing different views. In Proc. ISMIR, 2003.
23. Charu C. Aggarwal, Alexander Hinneburg, and Daniel A. Keim. On the surprising behavior of distance metrics in high dimensional space. In Proc. International Conference on Database Theory, 2001.
24. D. Li, I.K. Sethi, N. Dimitrova, and T. McGee. Classification of general audio data for content-based retrieval. Pattern Recognition Letters, 22:533.544, 2001.
25. I. Mierswa and K. Morik. Automatic feature extraction for classifying audio data. Machine Learning Journal, 58:127.149, 2005.
26. M. Goto. A chorus-section detecting method for musical audio signals. In Proc. ICASSP, pages 437. 440, 2003.
27. F. Takens. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In D.A. Rand and L.S. Young, editors, Dynamical systems and turbulences, pages 366.381. Springer, 1981.
28. A. Berenzweig, D. Ellis, and S. Lawrence. Anchor space for classification and similarity measurement of music. In Proc. ICME, pages I.29.32, 2003.
29. M.F. McKinney and J. Breebaart. Features for audio and music classification. In Proc. ISMIR, 2003.
30. Oliver Ritthoff, Ralf Klinkenberg, Simon Fischer, Ingo Mierswa, and Sven Felske. Yale: Yet another machine learning environment. In LLWA 01, Dortmund, Germany, pages 84.92, 2001.