Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures

Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 302-307

  Yu, Yang ^a   Zhao, Changwei ^a   Wang, Yangui ^a,b   Fan, Weihong ^a,c   Luan, Zhaokun ^a  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b CHINA UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Arsenic removal; Drinking water; Membrane separation; Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC (V) REMOVAL; ARSENIC REMOVAL; FEED SOLUTION; HUMIC ACID; ION CONCENTRATIONS; MEMBRANE SEPARATION; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS; NF MEMBRANES; OPERATING TIME; PERMEATE FLUX; REMOVAL OF ARSENICS; SYNTHETIC WATERS; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

ARSENIC; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC ACIDS; POLLUTION CONTROL; POTABLE WATER; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING PROCESS; WATER FILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ARSENIC;

ARSENIC; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DRINKING WATER; FILTRATION; HUMIC ACID; ION; MEMBRANE; ORGANIC MATTER; SEPARATION;

ARTICLE; FILTRATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT;

ARSENIC; FILTRATION; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84873552050     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60044-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bellona C, Marts M, Drewes JE The effect of organic membrane fouling on the properties and rejection characteristics of nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology 2010, 74(1):44-54.
2. Chakrabort D, Rahman MM, Paul K, Chowdhury UK, Sengupta MK, Lodh D, et al. Arsenic calamity in the Indian subcontinent: What lessons have been learned?. Talanta 2002, 58(1):3-22.
3. Cho J, Amy G, Pellegrino J Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes. Desalination 2000, 127(3):283-298.
4. ćurko J, Mijatović I, MatoŠić M, Jakopović HK, BoŠnja MU As(V) removal from drinking water by coagulation and filtration through immersed membrane. Desalination 2011, 279(1-3):404-408.
5. Drioli E, Criscuoli A, Curcio E Integrated membrane operations for seawater desalination. Desalination 2002, 147(1-3):77-81.
6. Figoli A, Cassano A, Criscuol A, Mozumder MSI, Uddin MT, Islam MA, et al. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration. Water Research 2010, 44(1):97-104.
7. Hug SJ, Leupin O Iron-catalyzed oxidation of arsenic(III) by oxygen and by hydrogen peroxide: pH-dependent formation of oxidants in the Fenton reaction. Environmental Science and Technology 2003, 37(12):2734-2742.
8. Karim MM Arsenic in groundwater and health problems in Bangladesh. Water Research 2000, 34(1):304-310.
9. KoŚutič K, Furač L, Sipos L, Kunst B Removal of arsenic and pesticides from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology 2005, 42(2):137-144.
10. Listiarini K, Sun DD, Leckie JO Organic fouling of nanofiltration membranes: Evaluating the effects of humic acid, calcium, alum coagulant and their combinations on the specific cake resistance. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 332(1-2):56-62.
11. Nghiem LD, Coleman PJ, Espendiller C Mechanisms underlying the effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of trace organic contaminants. Desalination 2010, 250(2):682-687.
12. Plakas KV, Karabelas AJ Triazine retention by nanofiltration in the presence of organic matter: The role of humic substance characteristics. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 336(1-2):86-100.
13. Saitúa H, Campderrós M, Cerutti S, Padilla AP Effect of operating conditions in removal of arsenic from water by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2005, 172(2):173-180.
14. Sato Y, Kang M, Kamei T, Magara Y Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal. Water Research 2002, 36(13):3371-3377.
15. Sen M, Manna A, Pal P Removal of arsenic form contaminated groundwater by membrane-integrated hybrid treatment system. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 354(1-2):108-113.
16. Shi R, Jia YF, Wang CZ Competitive and cooperative adsorption of arsenate and citrate on goethite. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2009, 21(1):106-112.
17. Tang CY, Kwon YN, Leckie JO Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltraion membranes by humic acid - effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions. Journal of Membrane Science 2007, 290(1-2):86-94.
18. Uddin MT, Mozumder SI, Figoli A, Drioli E, Islam MA Arsenic removal by conventional and membrane technology: an overview. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology 2007, 14(5):441-450.
19. Velizarov S, Crespo JG, Reis MA Removal of inorganic anions from drinking water supplies by membrane bio/processes. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 2004, 3(4):361-380.
20. Vrijenhoek EM, Waypa JJ Arsenic removal from drinking water by a " loose" nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2000, 130(3):265-277.
21. Zazouli MA, Susanto H, Nasseri S, Ulbricht M Influences of solution chemistry and polymeric natural organic matter on the removal of aquatic pharmaceutical residuals by nanofiltraion. Water Research 2009, 43(13):3270-3280.
22. Zheng YM, Zou SW, Nanayakkara KGN, Mastuura T, Chen JP Adsorptive removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by a PVDF/zirconia blend flat sheet membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 374(1-2):1-11.