Bias in research

Biochemia Medica

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 12-15

  Šimundić, Ana Maria ^a  

^a SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Bias; Research design; Sampling errors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FUNDING; HUMAN; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; PUBLICATION BIAS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84873539712     PISSN: 13300962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11613/BM.2013.003     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Gardenier JS, Resnik DB. The misuse of statistics: concepts, tools, and a research agenda. Account Res 2002;9:65-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989620212968.
2. Hren D, Lukić KI. Types of studies, power of study and choice of test. Acta Med Croatica 2006;60 Suppl 1:47-62.
3. Holmes TH. Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2004;286:495-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00484.2003.
4. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Reading the medical literature. In: Basic&Clinical biostatistics. New York - Toronto: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2004.
5. Simundic AM. Practical recommendations for statistical analysis and data presentation in Biochemia Medica journal. Biochem Med 2012;22:15-23.
6. Ilakovac V. Statistical hypothesis testing and some pitfalls. Biochem Med 2009;19:10-6.
7. Simundic AM. Biochemia Medica introduces the revised policy on Statement of Conflict of Interest. Biochem Med 2011;21:104-5.
8. Strasak AM. Statistical errors in medical research - a review of common pitfalls. Swiss Med Wkly 2007;137:44-9.