Mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by modified fly ash

Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 393-398

  Xu, Wenqing ^a   Wang, Hairui ^a,b   Zhu, Tingyu ^a   Kuang, Junyan ^a,b   Jing, Pengfei ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PROCESS ENGINEERING   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Flue gas; Fly ash; Mercury; Modified

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SITE; COAL COMBUSTION FLUE GAS; COMPETITIVE ADSORPTION; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; HG REMOVALS; HIGH SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA; MERCURY ADSORPTION; MERCURY EMISSIONS; MERCURY OXIDATIONS; MERCURY REMOVAL; METAL CHLORIDES; MODIFIED; MODIFIED FLY ASH; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PORE DIAMETERS; X-RAY PHOTOELECTRONS;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; CHEMISORPTION; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COAL COMBUSTION; COPPER COMPOUNDS; FLUE GASES; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; FLY ASH; MERCURY (METAL); OXIDATION; PHOTOELECTRONS; SULFUR DIOXIDE; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

PHYSISORPTION;

COAL; MERCURY; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

ADSORPTION; COAL; COMBUSTION; FLY ASH; MERCURY (ELEMENT); OXIDATION;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; FLY ASH; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; SPECTROMETRY;

AIR POLLUTION; COAL; COAL ASH; MERCURY; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

EID: 84873533828     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60065-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aegerter PA, Quigley WWC, Simpson GJ, Zieglar DD, Logan JW, Mccrea KR, et al. Thiophene hydrodesulfurization over alumina-supported molybdenum carbide and nitride catalysts: adsorption sites, catalytic activities, and nature of the active surface. Journal of Catalysis 1996, 164(1):109-121.
2. Bhardwaj R, Chen XH, Vidic RD Impact of fly ash composition on mercury speciation in simulated flue gas. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2009, 59(11):1331-1338.
3. Granite EJ, Pennline HW, Hargis RA Novel sorbents for mercury removal from flue gas. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2000, 39(4):1020-1029.
4. Gregg SJ, Sing KSW Adsorption, Surface Area, and Porosity 1989, Chemical Industry Press, Beijing.
5. Guo YF, Yan NQ, Yang SJ, Qu Z, Wu ZB, Liu Y, et al. Conversion of elemental mercury with a novel membrane delivery catalytic oxidation system (MDCOs). Environmental Science and Technology 2011, 45(2):706-711.
6. 2 impregnated activated coke. Energy Fuels 2010, 24(10):5426-5431.
7. Lee SS, Lee JY, Keener TC Bench-scale studies of in-duct mercury capture using cupric chloride-impregnated carbons. Environmental Science and Technology 2009, 43(8):2957-2962.
8. Li M, Liu J, Zhen CG Studies on mercury adsorption mechanism on unburned carbon surface. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics 2007, 28(5):882-884.
9. 2 catalysts prepared by sol-gel method. Catalysis Communications 2011, 12(14):1291-1294.
10. López-Antón MA, Abad-Valle P, Díaz-Somoano M, Suárez-Ruiz I, Martínez-Tarazona MR The influence of carbon particle type in fly ashes on mercury adsorption. Fuel 2009, 88(7):1194-1200.
11. Maroto-Valer MM, Zhang YZ, Granite EJ, Tang Z, Pennline HW Effect of porous structure and surface functionality on the mercury capacity of a fly ash carbon and its activated sample. Fuel 2005, 84(1):105-108.
12. Pavlish JH, Sondreal EA, Mann MD, Olson ES, Galbreath KC, Laudal DL, et al. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing Technology 2003, 82(2-3):89-165.
13. Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, Finkelman RB, Friedli HR, Leaner J, et al. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2010, 10(13):5951-5964.
14. Presto AA, Granite EJ Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environmental Science and Technology 2006, 40(18):5601-5609.
15. Ramanathan S, Oyama ST New catalysts for hydroprocessing: transition metal carbides and nitrides. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1995, 99(44):16365-16372.
16. Sasmaz E, Kirchofer A, Jew AD, Saha A, Abram D, Jaramillo TF, et al. Mercury chemistry on brominated activated carbon. Fuel 2012, 99:188-196.
17. Seal S, Barr TL, Sobczak N, Kerber SJ Microscopy and electron spectroscopic study of the interfacial chemistry in Al-Ti alloy/graphite systems. Journal of Materials Science 1998, 33(16):4147-4158.
18. Selamat MS, Watson LM, Baker TN XRD and XPS studies on surface MMC layer of SiC reinforced Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2003, 142(3):725-737.
19. Shen ZM, Ma J, Mei ZJ, Zhang JD Metal chlorides loaded on activated carbon to capture elemental mercury. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2010, 22(11):1814-1819.
20. Stöhr B, Boehm HP, Schlögl IR Enhancement of the catalytic activity of activated carbons in oxidation reactions by thermal treatment with ammonia or hydrogen cyanide and observation of a superoxide species as a possible intermediate. Carbon 1991, 29(6):707-720.
21. Uhlmann K, Harting M, Britton DT Characterization of titanium nitride layers by positron annihilation and X-ray diffraction. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 1994, 6(15):2943-2948.
22. Wang L, Che C Elemental mercury adsorption by residual carbon separated from fly ash. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing 2004, 26(4):353-356.
23. Wang L, Chen C Impacts of unburned carbon fractal characteristic to its mercury sorption reaction. Environmental Chemistry 2005, 24(1):59-62.
24. Wang S, Wu H Environmental-benign utilisation of fly ash as low-cost adsorbents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 136(3):482-501.
25. Wu J, Chen JH, Zhang SB, He P, Fang JH, Wu YC Removal of gas-phase elemental mercury by bromine-impregnated activated carbon. Progress in Environmental Science and Engineering 2012, 356-360:1660-1663.
26. 2 modified SCR catalyst for elemental mercury oxidation in coal-fired flue gas. Environmental Science and Technology 2011, 45(13):5725-5730.
27. Zhao YC, Zhang JY, Liu J, Diaz-Somoano M, Abad-Valle P, Martineez-Tarazone MR, et al. Experimental study on fly ash capture mercury in flue gas. Science China Technological Sciences 2010, 53(4):976-983.