Variation in Male Mate Choice in Drosophila melanogaster

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Edward, Dominic A ^a,b   Chapman, Tracey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POPULATION DENSITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84873531188     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056299     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J, (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 270: 653-664.
2. Halliday T (1983) The Study of Mate Choice. In: Bateson PPG, editor. Mate Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3-32.
3. Edward DA, Chapman T, (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 647-654.
4. Edward DA, Chapman T, (2012) Measuring the fitness benefits of male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution.
5. Byrne PG, Rice WR, (2006) Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 273: 917-922.
6. Long TAF, Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Rice WR, (2009) A Cost of Sexual Attractiveness to High-Fitness Females. Plos Biology 7: e1000254.
7. Gowaty PA, Steinichen R, Anderson WW, (2002) Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 56: 2537-2540.
8. Gowaty PA, Steinichen R, Anderson WW, (2003) Indiscriminate females and choosy males: Within- and between-species variation in Drosophila. Evolution 57: 2037-2045.
9. Bateman AJ, (1948) Intra-Sexual Selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
10. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co. pp. 136-179.
11. Linklater JR, Wertheim B, Wigby S, Chapman T, (2007) Ejaculate depletion patterns evolve in response to experimental manipulation of sex ratio in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 61: 2027-2034.
12. Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA, (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 313-320.
13. Jennions MD, Petrie M, (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 72: 283-327.
14. Rice WR, Linder JE, Friberg U, Lew TA, Morrow EH, et al. (2005) Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: Assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 6527-6534.
15. Edward DA, Chapman T, (2012) Sex-specific effects of developmental environment on reproductive trait expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecology and Evolution 2: 1362-1370.
16. Chenoweth SF, Blows MW, (2005) Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. American Naturalist 165: 281-289.
17. Candolin U, Salesto T, (2009) Does Competition Allow Male Mate Choosiness in Threespine Sticklebacks? American Naturalist 173: 273-277.
18. Wong BBM, McCarthy M, (2009) Prudent male mate choice under perceived sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquito fish. Behavioral Ecology 20: 278-282.
19. Bretman A, Fricke C, Chapman T, (2009) Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 276: 1705-1711.