Modeling challenges for predicting hydrologic response to degrading permafrost;Prévision de la réponse hydrologique à un permafrost se dégradant: Les défis de la modélisation

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 221-224

  Painter, S L ^a   Moulton, J D ^b   Wilson, C J ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Groundwater surface water relations; Multiphase flow; Numerical modeling; Permafrost; Subsidence

Indexed keywords

FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; MULTIPHASE FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERMAFROST; SUBSIDENCE;

EID: 84873522895     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: 14350157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-012-0917-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Balay S, Brown, J, Smith B et al (2011) PETSc users manual, revision 3. 2, ANL-95/11, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL.
2. Bartelt P, Lehning M (2002) A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning, part I: numerical model. Cold Reg Sci Technol 35(3): 123-145.
3. Benson DJ (1992) Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 99: 235-394.
4. Berndt M, Breil J, Galera S et al (2011) Two-step hybrid conservative remapping for multimaterial arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods. J Comp Phys 230: 6664-6687.
5. Chen Z, Huan G, Ma Y (2006) Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media. SIAM Computational Science and Engineering Series, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Dall'Amico M, Endrizzi S, Gruber S, Rigon R (2011) A robust and energy-conserving model of freezing variably-saturated soil. Cryosphere 5: 469-484.
7. Heroux M A, Willenbring JM (2007) Trilinos users guide. SAND Report: SAND2003-2952, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
8. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, 104.
9. Jorgenson MT, Shur YL, Pullman ER (2006) Abrupt increase in permafrost degradation in Arctic Alaska. Geophys Res Lett 33: L02503. doi: 10. 1029/2005GL024960.
10. Kelly CT (2003) Solving nonlinear Equations with Newton's method. SIAM Fundamentals of Algorithms Series, Philadelphia, PA.
11. Liljedahl A, Hinzman L, Schulla J (2012) Ice-wedge polygon type controls low-gradient watershed scale hydrology. Proceedings Tenth International Conference on Permafrost, Salekhard, Yamal-Nenets, Russia, 25-29 June 2012.
12. Lipnikov K, Manzini G, Svyatskiy D(2011) Monotonicity conditions in the mimetic finite difference method. In: Fort J et al. (eds) Proc. Mathematics "Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VI Problems and Perspectives", vol 1, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 653-662.
13. Painter SL (2011) Three-phase numerical model of water migration in partially frozen geological media: model formulation, validation, and applications. Comput Geosci 15(1): 69-85.
14. Panday S, Huyakorn PS (2004) A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow. Adv Water Resour 27(4): 361-382.
15. Spaans EJA, Baker JM (1996) The soil freezing characteristic: its measurement and similarity to the soil moisture characteristic. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60: 13-19.
16. Tarnocai C, Canadell JG, Schuur EAG et al (2009) Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23: GB2023.
17. Walker HF, Woodward CS, Yang UM (2010) An accelerated fixed-point iteration for solution of variably saturated flow. In: Carrera J (ed) Proc. XVIII International Conference on Water Resources, Barcelona, June 2010.
18. Wheeler MF, Xue G, Yotov I (2012) A multipoint flux mixed finite element method on distorted quadrilaterals and hexahedra. Numer Math 121: 165-204.