Modeling paternal attentiveness: Distressed pups evoke differential neurobiological and behavioral responses in paternal and nonpaternal mice

Neuroscience

Volumn 234, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-12

  Lambert, K G ^a   Franssen, C L ^a   Hampton, J E ^b   Rzucidlo, A M ^a   Hyer, M M ^a   True, M ^a   Kaufman, C ^a   Bardi, M ^b  

^a RANDOLPH MACON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fos immunoreactivity; Paternal attentiveness; Paternal neural circuit; Peromyscus model; Social affiliation; Vasopressin

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN FOS;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTIONALITY; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEAR; GROOMING; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; INSULA; JUMPING; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEDIAL PREOPTIC AREA; MOTIVATION; MOUSE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROBIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PATERNAL BEHAVIOR; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS CALIFORNICUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REST; SEPTUM PELLUCIDUM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN; MALE; MICE; PATERNAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84873520877     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.023     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bardi M., Franssen C.L., Hampton J.E., Shea E.A., Fanean A.P., Lambert K.G. Paternal experience and stress responses in California mice (Peromyscus californicus). Comp Med 2011, 61:20-30.
2. Barnshad M., Novak M., DeVries C. Cohabitation alters AVP innervation and paternal behavior in prairie voles. Physiol Behav 1994, 56:751-758.
3. Craig A.D. How do you feel? Interoception: the senser of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:655-666.
4. Craig A.D. How do you feel-now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009, 10:59-70.
5. Damasio A.R., Grabowski T.J., Bechara A., Damasio H., Ponto L.L.B., Parvizi J., Hichwa R.D. Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:1049-1056.
6. de Jong T.R., Chauke M., Harris B.N., Saltzman W. From here to paternity: neural correlates of the onset of paternal behavior in California mice (Peromyscus californicus). Horm Behav 2009, 56:220-231.
7. de Jong T.R., Measor K.R., Chauke M., Harris B.N., Saltzman W. Brief pup exposure induces Fos expression in the lateral habenula and serotonergic caudal dorsal raphe nucleus of paternally experienced male California mice (Peromyscus californicus). Neuroscience 2010, 169:1094-1104.
8. Dixson A.F. Reproductive biology of the owl monkey. Aotus: the owl monkey 1994, 113-132. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. J.F. Baer, R.E. Weller, I. Kakoma (Eds.).
9. Everts H.G., Koolhaas J.M. Lateral septal vasopressin in rats: role in social and object recognition?. Brain Res 1997, 760:1-7.
10. Fernandez-Duque E., Valeggia C.R., Mendoza S.P. The biology of paternal care in human and nonhuman primates. Annu Rev Anthropol 2009, 38:115-130.
11. Franklin K.B.J., Paxinos G. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates 2008, Elsevier, New York. 3rd ed.
12. Franssen C.L., Bardi M., Lambert K.G. Using a comparative species approach to investigate the neurobiology of paternal responses. J Vis Exp 2011, 55:e3173. 10.3791/3173.
13. Franssen C.L., Bardi M., Shea E.A., Hampton J.E., Franssen R.A., Kinsley C.H., Lambert K.G. Fatherhood alters behavioural and neural responsiveness in a spatial task. J Neuroendocrinol 2011, 23:1177-1187.
14. Goodson J.L., Bass A.H. Social behavior functions and related anatomical characteristics of vasotocin/vasopressin systems in vertebrates. Brain Res Rev 2001, 35:246-265.
15. Gubernick D.J., Nelson R.J. Prolactin and paternal behavior in the biparental California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Horm Behav 1989, 23:203-210.
16. Gubernick D.J., Teferi T. Adaptive significance of male parental care in a monogamous mammal. Proc R Soc Lond B 2000, 267:147-150.
17. Gubernick D.J., Winslow J.T., Jensen P., Jeanotte L., Bowen J. Oxytocin changes in males over the reproductive cycle in the monogamous, biparental California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Horm Behav 1995, 29:59-73.
18. Gusnard D.A., Raichle M.E. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001, 2:685-694.
19. Hrdy S.B. Mothers and others 2009, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
20. Jacobson C.D., Terkel J., Gorski R.A., Sawyer C.H. Effects of small medial preoptic area lesions on maternal behavior: retrieving and nest building in the rat. Brain Res 1980, 194:471-480.
21. JaŠarević E, Bailey DH, Crossland JP, Dawson WD, Szalai G, Ellersieck MR, Rosenfeld CS, Geary DC (2012) Evolution of monogamy, paternal investment, and female life history in Peromyscus. J Comp Psychol [Epub ahead of print].
22. Kleiman D.G., Malcolm J. The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. Parental care in mammals 1981, 347-387. Plenum Press, New York. D.J. Gubernick, P.H. Klopfer (Eds.).
23. Krukoff T. C-fos expression as a marker of functional activity in the brain. Neuromethods 1999, 33:213-230.
24. Lambert K.G. The parental brain: transformations and adaptations. Phys Behav 2012, 107:792-800.
25. Lambert K.G., Berry A.E., Griffins G., Amory-Meyers L., Madonia-Lomas L., Love G., Madonia E., Griffin G., Kinsley C.H. Pup exposure differentially enhances foraging ability in primiparous and nulliparous rats. Physiol Behav 2005, 84:799-806.
26. Lambert K.G., Franssen C.L., Bardi M., Hampton J.E., Hainley L., Karsner K., Tu E.B., Hyer M.M., Crockett A., Baranova A., Ferguson T., Ferguson T., Kinsley C.H. Characteristic neurobiological patterns differentiate paternal responsiveness in two Peromyscus species. Brain Behav Evol 2011, 77:159-175.
27. Lambert KG, Kinsley CH (2008). The neuroeconomics of motherhood: costs and benefits of maternal investment. In: Bridges R, editor. The parental brain. New York: Elsevier.
28. Lee A.W., Brown R.E. Medial preoptic lesions disrupt parental behavior in both male and female California mice (Peromyscus californicus). Behav Neurosci 2002, 116:968-975.
29. Lee A.W., Brown R.E. Comparison of medial preoptic, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens lesions on paternal behavior in California mice (Peromyscus californicus). Physiol Behav 2007, 92:617-628.
30. Love G., Torrey N., McNamara I., Morgan M., Banks M., Hester N.W., Wightman N., Glasper E.R., DeVries A.C., Kinsley C.H., Lambert K.G. Maternal experience produces long-lasting behavioral modifications in the rat. Behav Neurosci 2005, 119:1084-1096.
31. Mériau K., Wartenburger I., Kazzer P., Prehn K., Lammers C.H., van der Meer E., Villringer A., Heekeren H.R. A neural network reflecting individual differences in cognitive processing of emotions during perceptual decision making. Neuroimage 2006, 33:1016-1027.
32. Pereira M., Morrell J.I. Functional mapping of the neural circuitry of rat maternal motivation: effects of site-specific transient neural inactivation. J Neuroendocrinol 2011, 23:1020-1035.
33. Pitkow L.J., Sharer C.A., Ren X., Insel T.R., Terwilliger E.F., Young L.J. Facilitation of affiliation and pair-bond formation by vasopressin receptor gene transfer into the ventral forebrain of a monogamous vole. J Neurosci 2001, 21:7392-7396.
34. Puglisi-Allegra S., Ventura R. Prefrontal/accumbal catecholamine system processes high motivational salience. Front Behav Neurosci 2012, 6:31.
35. Rebola J., Castelhano J., Ferreira C., Castelo-Branco M. Functional parcellation of the operculo-insular cortex in perceptual decision making: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3693-3701.
36. Parental care: evolution, mechanisms, and adaptive significance, Vol. 25 1996, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. J.S. Rosenblatt, C.T. Snowdon (Eds.).
37. Schulkin J. Social allostasis: anticipating regulation of the internal milieu. Front Evol Neurosci 2011, 10.3389/fnevo.2010.00111.
38. Seifritz E., Esposito F., Neuhoff J.G., Luthi A., Mustovic H., Dammann G., von Bardeleben U., Radue E.W., Cirillo S., Tedeschi G., Di Salle F. Differential sex-independent amygdala response to infant crying and laughing in parents versus nonparents. Biol Psychol 2003, 54:1367-1375.
39. Sewards T.V., Sewards M.A. Representations of motivational drives in mesial cortex, medial thalamus, hypothalamus and midbrain. Brain Res Bull 2003, 61:25-49.
40. Simpson J.R., Drevets W.C., Snyder A.Z., Gusnard D.A., Raichle M.E. Emotion-induced changes in human medial prefrontal cortex. II. During anticipatory anxiety. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:688-693.
41. Stack E.C., Balakrishnan R., Numan M.J., Numan M. A functional neuroanatomical investigation of the role of the medial preoptic area in neural circuits regulating maternal behavior. Behav Brain Res 2002, 131:17-36.
42. Trainor B.C., Marler C.A. Testosterone, paternal behavior, and aggression in the monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus). Horm Behav 2001, 40:32-42.
43. Turner L.M., Young A.R., Rompler H., Schoneberg T., Phelps S.M., Hoekstra H.E. Monogamy evolves through multiple mechanisms: evidence from V1aR in deer mice. Mol Biol Evol 2010, 27:1269-1278.
44. Wolovich C.K., Evans S., Green S.M. Mated pairs of owl monkeys (Aotus nancymaae) exhibit sex differences in response to unfamiliar male and female conspecifics. J Primatol 2010, 72:942-950.
45. Wright P.C. Biparental care in Aotus trivirgatus and Callicebus moloch. Female primates: studies by women primatologists 1984, 59-75. Alan R. Liss, New York. M.F. Small (Ed.).
46. Wynne-Edwards K.E., Timonin M.E. Paternal care in rodents: weakening support for hormonal regulation of the transition to behavioral fatherhood in rodent animal models of biparental care. Horm Behav 2007, 52:114-121.
47. Young K.A., Liu Y., Wang Z. The neurobiology of social attachment: a comparative approach to behavioral, neuroanatomical and neurochemical studies. Comp Biochem Physiol C: Toxicol Pharmacol 2008, 148:401-410.