Controlling CCTV in public spaces: Is privacy the (only) issue? reflections on norwegian and danish observations

Surveillance and Society

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 396-414

  Sætnan, Ann Rudinow ^a   Lomell, Heidi Mork ^b   Wiecek, Carsten ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c Municipality of Skedsmo   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873505158     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Al-Homoud MA and N Abu-Obeid (2003) ‘University outdoor spatial layout effect on perception of students’ interaction and group seclusion’. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20(3): 221-233.
2. Bijker, W.E. (2003) ‘The Need for Public Intellectuals: A Space for STS.’ Pre-Presidential Address, Annual Meeting 2001, Cambridge, MA. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(4): 443-450.
3. Bourdieu, Pierre (1986). ‘The Forms of Capital.’ In John Richardson, Ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 241-258.
4. Farrel SJ, T Aubry, and D Coulombe (2004) ‘Neighborhoods and neighbors: Do they contribute to personal well-being?’ Journal of Community Psychology 32(1): 9-25.
5. Flint, C, ed. (2004) Spaces of Hate. Geographies of Discrimination and Intolerance in the U.S.A. New York/London: Routledge.
6. Immigration and Immigrants 2002, table 2.1.6 in Statistical Analyses: 50. Statistics Norway. http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/02/sa_innvand_en/sa54/tab/2.1.6.html
7. Jutras S (2003) ‘“Go outside and play!” Contributions of an urban environment to the developing and wellbeing of children.’ Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 44(3): 257-266.
8. Kuo FE, WC Sullivan, RL Coley, and L Brunson (1998) ‘Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces.’ American Journal of Community Psychology 26(6): 823-851.
9. Lomell, H.M., Sætnan, AR and Wiecek, C (2003) ‘Flexible technology, structured practices. Surveillance operations in 14 Norwegian and Danish organizations.’ http://www.urbaneye.net/results/ue_wp9.pdf
10. Lund H (2002) ‘Pedestrian environments and sense of community.’ Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(3): 301-312.
11. Madanipour A (2003) ‘Social Exclusion and Space.’ In LeGates and Stout (eds.) City Reader. London/ New York: Routledge: pp. 181-188.
12. McCahill, M. (2002) The surveillance web. The rise of visual surveillance in an English city. Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan Pub.
13. McCahill, M. and Norris, C. (2002) ‘CCTV in London.’ http://www.urbaneye.net/results/ue_wp6.pdf
14. Ney, S. and Pichler, K. (2002) ‘Video surveillance in Austria.’ http://www.urbaneye.net/results/ue_wp7.pdf
15. Norris, Clive and Gary Armstrong (1999) The maximum surveillance society: The rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg. Skjæveland O and T Garling (1997) ‘Effects of interactional space on neighbouring.’ Journal of Environmental Psychology 17 (3): 181-198.
16. Statistics Denmark: http://www.statistikbanken.dk
17. Talen E (1999) ‘Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism.’ Urban Studies 36(8): 1361-1379.
18. Wiecek¸ Carsten and Sætnan, Ann Rudinow (2002a) ‘Restrictive? Permissive? The Contradictory Framing of Video Surveillance in Norway and Denmark.’ http://www.urbaneye.net/results/ue_wp4.pdf
19. Wiecek¸ Carsten and Sætnan, Ann Rudinow (2002b) ‘Geographies of Visibility. Zooming in on Video Surveillance Systems in Oslo and Copenhagen.’ http://www.urbaneye.net/results/ue_wp5.pdf