Facilitated estimation of ETAS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 601-605

  Schoenberg, Frederic Paik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION TECHNIQUES; CALIFORNIA; EARTHQUAKE CATALOGS; EPIDEMIC-TYPE AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCES; INTEGRAL TERMS; LOG LIKELIHOOD; RAPID CONVERGENCE;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EARTHQUAKES;

AFTERSHOCK; EARTHQUAKE; EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; ESTIMATION METHOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; HECTOR MINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84873504260     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: 19433573     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120120146     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chu, A., F. P. Schoenberg, P. Bird, D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2011). Comparison of ETAS parameter estimates across different global tectonic zones, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101, no. 5, 2323-2339.
2. Console, R., M. Murru, and G. Falcone (2010). Probability gains of an epidemic-type aftershock sequence model in retrospective forecasting of M ≥ 5 earthquakes in Italy, J. Seismol. 14, no. 1, 9-26.
3. Harte, D. (2012). Bias in fitting the ETAS model: A case study based on New Zealand seismicity, Geophys. J. Int. (in press).
4. Helmstetter, A., and D. Sornette (2003). Predictability in the epidemic-type aftershock sequence model of interacting triggered seismicity, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B10, 2482-2499.
5. Ogata, Y. (1978). The asymptotic behaviour of maximum likelihood estimators for stationary point processes, Ann. Int. Statist. Math. 30, 243-261.
6. Ogata, Y. (1988). Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83, 9-27.
7. Ogata, Y. (1998). Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 50, no. 2, 379-402.
8. Ogata, Y., L. M. Jones, and S. Toda (2003). When and where the aftershock activity was depressed: Contrasting decay patterns of the proximate large earthquakes in southern California, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B6, 2318.
9. Schoenberg, F. P. (2003). Multidimensional residual analysis of point process models for earthquake occurrences, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 98, no. 464, 789-795.
10. Schoenberg, F. P., A. Chu, and A. Veen (2010). On the relationship between lower magnitude thresholds and bias in ETAS parameter estimates, J. Geophys. Res. 115, no. B04, 309-324.
11. Schorlemmer, D., M. C. Gerstenberger, S. Wiemer, D. D. Jackson, and D. A. Rhoades (2007). Earthquake likelihood model testing, Seismol. Res. Lett. 78, no. 1, 17-29.
12. Sornette, D. (2005). Apparent clustering and apparent background earthquakes biased by undetected seismicity, J. Geophys. Res. 110, B09303.
13. Stoyan, D., and P. Grabarnik (1991). Second-order characteristics for stochastic structures connected with Gibbs point processes, Math. Nachr. 151, 95-100.
14. Tiampo, K. R., and R. Shcherbakov (2012). Seismicity-based earthquake forecasting techniques: Ten years of progress, Tectonophysics 522, 89-121.
15. Vere-Jones, D., and J. Zhuang (2008). Distribution of the largest event in the critical epidemic-type aftershock-sequence model, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear and Soft Matter Physics 78, 047102.
16. Wang, Q., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2011). California earthquake forecasts based on smoothed seismicity: Model choices, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101, no. 3, 1422-1430.
17. Wang, Q., F. P. Schoenberg, D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2010). Standard errors of parameter estimates in the ETAS model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, no. 5A, 1989-2001.
18. Werner, M. J., A. Helmstetter, D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2011). High-resolution long-term and short-term earthquake forecasts for California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101, no. 4, 1630-1648.
19. Zechar, J. D., M. C. Gerstenberger, and D. A. Rhoades (2010). Likelihood- based tests for evaluating space-rate-magnitude earthquake forecasts, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, no. 3, 1184-1195.
20. Zhuang, J. (2011). Next-day earthquake forecasts for the Japan region generated by the ETAS model, Earth Planets Space 63, 207-216.