The regional advisory councils' current capacities and unforeseen benefits

Maritime Studies

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-20

  Ounanian, Kristen ^a   Hegland, Troels Jacob ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMON FISHERIES POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY REFORM; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84873502583     PISSN: 18727859     EISSN: 22129790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2212-9790-11-10     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Chase, Lisa C, Daniel J Decker, and T Bruce Lauber. 2004. Public participation in wildlife management: what do stakeholders want? Society and Natural Resources 17:629-639
2. Commission. 2008. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Review of the functioning of the Regional Advisory Councils COM (2008) 364 final. Commission of the European Communities: Brussels
3. Commission. 2011. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Review of the functioning of the Regional Advisory Councils COM (2008) 364 final. Commission of the European Communities:Brussels
4. Council. 2004. Council Decision establishing Regional Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy. Official Journal of the European UnionL 256:17-22
5. Dalton, Tracey M 2005. Beyond biogeography: a framework for involving the public in planning of U.S. marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 19(5):1392-1401
6. Dalton, Tracey M 2006. Exploring participants' views on participatory coastal and marine resource management processes. Coastal Management 34:351-367
7. Gray, Tim, and Jenny Hatchard. 2003. The 2002 reform of the common fisheries policy's system of governance-rhetoric or reality? Marine Policy 27:545-554
8. Halvorsen, Kathleen E 2003. Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review 63(5)535-543
9. Hanna, Susan. 1995. User participation and fishery management performance within the Pacific fishery management council.Ocean & Coastal Management 28(1 -3):23-44
10. Hegland, Troels J, Kristen Ounanian, and Jesper Raakjær. 2012a. Why and how to regionalise the common fisheries policy.A theoretical framework.Maritime Studies 11:7
11. Hegland, Troels J, Kristen Ounanian, and Jesper Raakjær. 2012b. What does 'regionalisation' mean? An exploratory mapping of opinions on reform of the common fisheries policy.Maritime Studies 11:8
12. Raakjær, Jesper 2009. A fisheries management system in crisis - the EU Common Fisheries Policy. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press
13. Raakjær Nielsen, Jesper 2003. An analytical framework for studying: compliance and legitimacy in fisheries management. Marine Policy 27(5)425-432
14. Raakjær Jesper, et al. 2010. Exploring the Option of Regionalising the Common Fisheries Policy: Work Package 4 Technical Document. 2 ed. University of Liverpool
15. Sen, Sevaly, and Jesper Raakjær Nielsen. 1996. Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis. Marine Policy 20 (5)405-418
16. Symes, David 2012.Regionalising the Common Fisheries Policy: context, content, and controversy. Maritime Studies 11:6