Landsat-based land cover change analysis in northeastern Oregon's timber-resource-dependent communities

American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference 2012, ASPRS 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 51-62

  Campbell, Michael J ^a   Congalton, Russell G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Change detection; Decision trees; Land cover; Landsat; Object based image analysis (OBIA); Segmentation

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTIONS; CHANGE DETECTION; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; LAND COVER; LAND COVER ANALYSIS; LAND-COVER CHANGE; LANDSAT; OBJECT BASED; OBJECT BASED IMAGE ANALYSIS; RULE SET; SMALL SCALE; SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT;

DECISION TREES; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SIGNAL DETECTION;

LANDFORMS;

EID: 84873490568     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Blaschke, T., 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65:2-16.
2. Byrne, G. F., P. F. Crapper, & K. K. Mayo, 1980. Monitoring land-cover change by principal component analysis of multitemporal Landsat data, Remote Sensing of Environment 10:175-184.
3. Chander, G. & B. Markham, 2003. Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41(11):2674-2677.
4. Chavez, Jr. P. S., 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 24:459-479.
5. Chavez, Jr., P. S., 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections - revisited and improved, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(2):1025-1036.
6. Congalton, R., R.. Oderwald, & R. Mead, 1983. Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 49(12):1671-1678.
7. Congalton, R. G. & K. Green, 2009. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practices, Second Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 208 pp.
8. Dobson, J. E., E. A. Bright, R. L. Ferguson, D. W. Field, L. L. Wood, K. D. Haddad, H. Iredale, J. R. Jensen, V. V. Klemas, R. J. Orth, & J. P. Thomas, 1995. NOAA Coastal Change Analysis Porgram (CCAP): guideance for regional implementation, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 123, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Seattle, WA.
9. Geneletti, D. & B. G. H. Gorte, 2003. A method for object-oriented land cover classification combining Landsat TM data and aerial photographs, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(6):1273-1286.
10. Green, K., 2006. Landsat in context: The land remote sensing business model, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(10):1147-1153.
11. Homer, C., C. Huang, L. Yang, B. Wylle, & M. Coan, 2004. Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(7);829-840.
12. Im, J., J. R. Jensen, & J. A. Tullis, 2008. Object-based change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(2):399-423.
13. Jensen, J. R., 2005. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Third Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, United Statesm. 526 pp.
14. Lambin, E. F. & A. H. Strahler, 1994. Change-vector analysis in multitemporal space: A tool to detect and categorize land-cover change processes using high temporal-resolution satellite data, Remote Sensing of Environment 48:231-244.
15. MacLean, M. G. & R. G. Congalton, 2011. Investigating issues in map accuracy when using an object-based approach to map benthic habitats, GIScience & Remote Sensing, 48(4):457-477.
16. MacLean, M. G. & R. G. Congalton, 2012. Map accuracy assessment issues when using an object-oriented approach, In: Proceedings of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2012 Annual Conference: 5pp.
17. Mahlny, A. S. & B. J. Turner, 2007. A comparison of four common atmospheric correction methods, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73(4):361-368.
18. Meyer, P., K. I. Itten, T. Kellenberger, S. Sandmeier, & R. Sandmeier, 1993. Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in an alpine environment, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 48(4):17-28.
19. Möller, M., L. Lymburner, & M. Volk, 2007. The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9:311-321.
20. Moran, M. S., R. D. Jackson, P. N. Slater, & P. M. Teillet, 1992. Evaluation of simplified procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output Remote Sensing of Environment 41:169-184.
21. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), "Landsat 7." The Landsat Program. Web. 4 January 2012. 〈http://landsat.gsfc. nasa.gov/about/landsat7.html〉.
22. Radoux, J., P. Bogaert, D. Fasbender, & P. Defourny, 2010. Thematic accuracy assessment of geographic object-based image classification, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(6):895-911.
23. Xian, G., C. Homer, & J. Fry, 2009. Updating the 2001 National Land Cover Database land cover classification to 2006 using Landsat imagery change detection methods, Remote Sensing of Environment, 113:1133-1147.