Advice of improving systematic review meta analysis quality for traditional chinese medicine

Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi

Volumn 37, Issue 18, 2012, Pages 2702-2704

  Zhan, Si Yan ^a   Hu, Jing ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

Quality; Systematic review; Traditional chinese medicine

Indexed keywords

CHINESE MEDICINE; DRUG QUALITY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); ARTICLE; LITERATURE; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD;

HUMANS; MEDICINE, CHINESE TRADITIONAL; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873480978     PISSN: 10015302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4268/cjcmm20121807     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Junhua Z, Hongrai S, Xiumei Gt et al. Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine J. J Altern Complement Med, 2007, 13(8): 797.
2. Ma B, Guo J, Qi G, et al. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese joumals[ J]. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(5) :e20185.
3. Hu J, Zhang J, Zhao W, et al. Cochrane systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines; an overview [J ]. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6 ( 12) :e28696.
4. He J, Du L, Liu G, et al. Quality assessment of reporting of ran-domization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews[J]. Trials, 2011, 13(12) : 122.
5. Bian Z, Liu B, Moher D, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) for traditional Chinese medicine; current situation and future development [ J ]. Front Med, 2011, 5(2): 171.
6. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M J, et al. Grey literature in Meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions J. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007, 18(2); MR000010.
7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; the PRISMA statement [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2009, 151(4); 264.