Younger and older adults' comprehension of health risk probabilities: Understanding the relationship between format and numeracy

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 120-124

  Fausset, Cara Bailey ^a   Rogers, Wendy A ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OLDER ADULTS; RISK PROBABILITIES;

STATISTICS;

PROBABILITY;

EID: 84873475600     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181312561002     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Couper, M. P., & Singer, E. (2009). The role of numeracy in informed consent for surveys. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4, 17-26. doi:10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.17
2. Durso, F. T., Rawson, K. A., & Girotto, S. (2007). Comprehension and situation awareness. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, T. J. Perfect (Eds.). Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed.) (pp. 164-193). Hoboken, NJ US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
3. Fausset, C. B. (2012). Comprehension of health risk probabilities: The roles of age, numeracy, format, and mental representation. Unpublished dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
4. Finucane, M. L., & Gullion, C. M. (2010). Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 271-288. doi:10.1037/a0019106
5. Fuller, R., Dudley, N., & Blacktop, J. (2001). Risk communication and older people-understanding of probability and risk information by medical inpatients aged 75 years and older. Age and Ageing, 30, 473-476.
6. Galesic, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Straubinger, N. (2009). Natural frequencies help older adults and people with low numeracy to evaluate medical screening tests. Medical Decision Making, 29(3), 368-371.
7. Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ, 327, 741-744.
8. Golbeck, A. L., Ahlers-Schmidt, C. R., Paschal, A. M., & Dismuke, S. E. (2005). A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29, 375-376.
9. Gramling, R., Irvin, J., Nash, J., Sciamanna, C., & Culpepper, L. (2004). Numeracy and medicine: Key family physician attitudes about communicating probability with patients. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 17, 473.
10. th ed., pp. 209-232). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Knapp, P., Gardner, P. H., Carrigan, N., Raynor, D. K., & Woolf, E. (2009). Perceived risk of medicine side effects in users of a patient information website: A study of the use of verbal descriptors, percentages and natural frequencies. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 579-594. doi: 10.1348/135910708x375344
12. Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., & Baer, C. (2005). A first look at the literacy of America's adults in the 21st century. National Center for Education Statistics Publication No. 2006-470. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
13. Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37-44.
14. Peters, E., Slovic, P., Vastfjall, D., & Mertz, C. K., (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 619-635.
15. Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407-413.
16. Reyna, V. F. (2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28, 850-865.
17. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89-107.
18. Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966-972.
19. Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., Zwick, R., & Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348-365. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.4.348
20. Weinstein, N. (1999). What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 15-20.
21. Windschitl, P. D. & Wells, G. L. (1996). Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 343-364.