Reuse, remix, repeat: The workflows of MIR

Proceedings of the 13th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 409-414

  Page, Kevin R ^a   Fields, Ben ^b,c   De Roure, David ^a   Crawford, Tim ^c   Stephen Downie, J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b Musicmetric (Semetric Ltd)   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILE FORMATS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; REPRODUCIBLE RESEARCH; RESEARCH OBJECT; SOFTWARE LIBRARIES; WORK-FLOWS;

ALGORITHMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTEROPERABILITY; METADATA;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84873472741     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. S. Bechhofer, I. Buchan, D. De Roure, P. Missier, et al Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, In press/online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004.
2. K. Belhajjame, O. Corcho, D. Garijo, J. Zhao, et al Workflow-centric research objects: First class citizens in scholarly discourse. In Proc. Workshop on the Semantic Publishing (SePublica), pages 1-12, 2012.
3. J. Bullock. Libxtract: A lightweight library for audio feature extraction. In Proc. International Computer Music Conference, pages 25-28, 2007.
4. C. Cannam, C. Landone, M. Sandler, and J.P. Bello. The sonic visualiser: A visualisation platform for semantic descriptors from musical signals. In Proc. 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pages 324-327, 2006.
5. M.A. Casey, R. Veltkamp, M. Goto, M. Leman, et al Content-based music information retrieval: current directions and future challenges. Proc. IEEE, 96(4):668-696, 2008.
6. J.S. Downie, D. Byrd, and T. Crawford. Ten years of ISMIR: Reflections on challenges and opportunities. In Proc. 10th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pages 13-18, 2009.
7. J.S. Downie, A.F. Ehmann, and X. Hu. Music-to-knowledge (M2K): a prototyping and evaluation environment for music digital library research. In Proc. 5th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 376-376, 2005.
8. R. Fiebrink, G. Wang, and P. Cook. Support for MIR prototyping and real-time applications in the chuck programming language. In Proc. 9th International Conference of Music Information Retrieval, pages 153-158, 2008.
9. Y. Gil. Workflow composition: Semantic representations for flexible automation. Workflows for e-Science, pages 244-257, 2007.
10. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, et al The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1):10-18, 2009.
11. O. Lartillot and P. Toiviainen. MIR in Matlab (II): A toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio. In Proc. 8th International Society of Music Information Retrieval Conference, pages 127-130, 2007.
12. D. McEnnis, C. McKay, and I. Fujinaga. Overview of OMEN. In Proc. International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pages 7-12, 2006.
13. C. McKay. Automatic music classification with jMIR. PhD thesis, McGill University, 2010.
14. C. McKay, J.A. Burgoyne, J. Thompson, and I. Fujinaga. Using ACE XML 2.0 to store and share feature, instance and class data for musical classification. In Proc. International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pages 303-8, 2009.
15. D. Mitrović, M. Zeppelzauer, and C. Breiteneder. Features for content-based audio retrieval. Advances in Computers, 78:71-150, 2010.
16. K. R. Page, B. Fields, B.J. Nagel, G. O'Neill, et al Semantics for music analysis through linked data: How country is my country? In Proc. IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science, pages 41-48, 2010.
17. Y. Raimond, S. Abdallah, M. Sandler, and F. Giasson. The music ontology. In Proc. International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pages 417-422, 2007.
18. C. Rhodes, T. Crawford, M. Casey, and M. d'Inverno. Investigating music collections at different scales with audiodb. Journal of New Music Research, 39(4):337-348, 2010.
19. S.L. Star and J.R. Griesemer. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3):387-420, 1989.
20. G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook. Marsyas: A framework for audio analysis. Organised sound, 4(3):169-175, 1999.
21. G. Tzanetakis, L.G. Martins, L.F. Teixeira, C. Castillo, R. Jones, and M. Lagrange. Interoperability and the marsyas 0.2 runtime. In Proc. International Computer Music Conference, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbp2372.2008. 149.
22. Ge Wang. The ChucK Audio Programming Language A Strongly-timed and On-the-fly Environ/mentality. PhD thesis, Princeton University, 2008.
23. K. West, A. Kumar, A. Shirk, G. Zhu, et al The networked environment for music analysis (NEMA). In Proc. 6th IEEE World Congress on Services, pages 314-317, 2010.