The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 91-106

  Adie, Lenore ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

moderation; professional judgement; sociocultural theories of learning; standards based assessment; teacher identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873463609     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2011.650150     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baird, J. 2010. Beliefs and practice in teacher assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1): 1-5.
2. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, London: Sage.
3. Collins, S., Reiss, M. and Stobart, G. 2010. What happens when high-stakes testing stops? Teachers' perceptions of the impact of compulsory national testing in science of 11-year-olds in England and its abolition in Wales. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(3): 273-286.
4. Hall, K. and Murphy, P. 2008. "Introduction". In Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities, Edited by: Hall, K., Murphy, P. and Soler, J. ix-xiv. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.
5. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D. and Cain, C. 1998. Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Leighton, J.P., Gokiert, R.J., Cor, M.K. and Heffernan, C. 2010. Teacher beliefs about the cognitive diagnostic information of classroom- versus large-scale tests: Implications for assessment literacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1): 7-21.
8. MacCann, R.G. and Stanley, G. 2010. Classification consistency when scores are converted to grades: Examination marks versus moderated school assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(3): 255-272.
9. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. and Kramer, R. 1996. "Swift trust and temporary groups". In Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, Edited by: Kramer, R.M. and Tyler, T.R. 166-195. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Penuel, W.R. and Wertsch, J.V. 1995. Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30(2): 83-92.
11. Queensland Department of Education and the Arts. 2005. Queensland curriculum, assessment and reporting framework, Brisbane, Australia: Strategic Policy and Education Futures.
12. Rogoff, B. 1995. "Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship". In Sociocultural studies of mind, Edited by: Wertsch, J.V., del Rio, P. and Alvarez, A. 139-164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Sfard, A. and Prusak, A. 2005. Telling identities: In search of an analytical tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4): 14-22.
14. Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V. and Gunn, S. 2010. The centrality of teachers' judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1): 59-75.