The input-output relationship approach to structural identifiability analysis

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 171-181

  Bearup, Daniel J ^a   Evans, Neil D ^b   Chappell, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational methods; Differential algebra; Enzyme kinetics; Identifiability

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL SYSTEMS; CLASSICAL MODEL; DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRAS; DIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIAL; IDENTIFIABILITY; INPUT-OUTPUT; INPUT-OUTPUT RELATIONS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MODEL SYSTEM; PHYSICAL DATA; REACTION SCHEMES; STRUCTURAL IDENTIFIABILITY;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ENZYME KINETICS;

ENZYME;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; COMPARTMENT MODEL; ENZYME KINETICS; LINEAR SYSTEM; MATHEMATICS; METABOLISM; REACTION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOCATALYSIS; ENZYMES; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 84873459545     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Walter E. Identifiability of State Space Models, with Applications to Transformation Systems 1982, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York.
2. Pohjanpalo H. System identifiability based on the power series expansion of the solution. Mathematical Biosciences 1978, 41:21-33.
3. Vajda S., Godfrey K., Rabitz H. Similarity transformation approach to identifiability analysis of nonlinear compartmental models. Mathematical Biosciences 1989, 93:217-248.
4. Ljung L., Glad T. On global identifiability for arbitrary model parametrizations. Automatica 1994, 30:265-276.
5. Audoly S., Bellu G., D'Angiò L., Saccomani M., Cobelli C. Global identifiability of nonlinear models of biological systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2001, 48:55-65.
6. Nemcova J. Structural identifiability of polynomial and rational systems. Mathematical Biosciences 2010, 223:83-96.
7. Yates J.W.T., Evans N.D., Chappell M.J. Structural identifiability analysis via symmetries of differential equations. Automatica 2009, 45:2585-2591.
8. S. Vajda, Structural identifiability of linear, bilinear, polynomial and rational systems, in: L. Ljung, A. Titli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th IFAC World Congress, 1984, p. 107.
9. Margaria G., Riccomagno E., Chappell M., Wynn H. Differential algebra methods for the study of the structural identifiability of rational function state-space models in the biosciences. Mathematical Biosciences 2001, 174:1-26.
10. Evans N., Chapman M., Chappell M., Godfrey K. Identifiability of uncontrolled nonlinear rational systems. Automatica 2002, 38:1799-1805.
11. Denis-Vidal L., Joly-Blanchard G., Noiret C. Some effective approaches to check the identifiability of uncontrolled nonlinear systems. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 2001, 57:35-44.
12. Bellu G., Saccomani M., Audoly S., D'Angiò L. DAISY: a new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2007, 52-61.
13. Sedoglavic A. A probabilistic algorithm to test local algebraic in polynomial time. Journal of Symbolic Computation 2002, 33:735-755.
14. Kell D.B. Systems biology, metabolic modelling and metabolomics in drug discovery and development. Drug discovery today 2006, 11:1085-1092.
15. Evans N., Chappell M. Extensions to a procedure for generating locally identifiable reparameterisations of unidentifiable systems. Mathematical Biosciences 2000, 168:137-159.
16. Hattersley J.G., Pérez-Velzáquez J., Chappell M.J., Bearup D., Roper D., Dowson C., Bugg T., Evans N.D. Indistinguishability and identifiability of kinetic models for the MurC reaction in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2011, 104:70-80.
17. Ritt J. Differential Algebra 1950, AMS Colloquium Publications, New York. 1st edition.
18. Boulier F., Lazard D., Ollivier F., Petitot M. Representation for the radical of a finitely generated differential ideal. in: ISSAC'95: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation 1995, 158-166.
19. E. Hubert, étude algébrique et algorithmique des singularités des équations difféntielles implicites, Ph.D. thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, 1997.
20. Boulier F., Lazard D., Ollivier F., Petitot M. Computing representations for radicals of finitely generated differential ideals. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing 2009, 20:73-121.
21. Monagan M.B., Geddes K.O., Heal K.M., Labahn G., Vorkoetter S.M., McCarron J., DeMarco P. Maple 10 Programming Guide 2005, Maplesoft, Waterloo ON, Canada.
22. Krusemeyer M. Why does the Wronskian work. American Mathematical Monthly 1988, 95:46-49.
23. Holmberg A. On the practical identifiability of microbial growth models incorporating Michaelis-Menten type nonlinearities. Mathematical Biosciences 1982, 62:23-43.
24. Chappell M.J., Godfrey K.R. Structural identifiability of the parameters of a nonlinear batch reactor model. Mathematical Biosciences 1992, 108:241-251.
25. Dixon M., Webb E.C. Enzymes 1979, Longman Group Ltd., New York. 3rd edition.