Gold standard based ontology evaluation using instance assignment

EON 2006 - Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web: 4th International Workshop - Located at the 15th International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Brank, Janez ^a   Mladenic, Dunja ^a   Grobelnik, Marko ^a  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION APPROACH; GOLD STANDARDS;

GOLD;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84873439840     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. BLOEHDORN, S., HAASE, P., SURE, Y, VOELKER, J., BEVK, M., BONTCHEVA, K., ROBERTS, I., Report on the integration of ML, HLT and OM. SEKT Deliverable D.6.6.1, July 2005.
2. BRANK, J., MLADENIĆ, D., GROBELNIK, M., Automatic Evaluation of Ontologies. In: Kao, A., Poteet, S. (eds.), Text Mining and Natural Language Processing, Springer, 2006 (to appear).
3. BREWSTER, C., ALANI, H., DASMAHAPATRA, S., WILKS, Y., Data driven ontology evaluation. Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, 26-28 May 2004.
4. BURTON-JONES, A., STOREY, V. C., SUGUMARAN, V., AHLUWALIA, P., A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Accepted by Data and Knowledge Engineering (2004).
5. CHAWATHE, S. S., RAJARAMAN, A., GARCIA-MOLINA, H., WIDOM, J., Change Detection in Hierarchically Structured Information. Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Conference, pp. 493-504, 1996.
6. DING, L., FININ, T., JOSHI, A., PAN, R., COST, R. S., PENG, Y., REDDIVARI, P., DOSHI, V., SACHS, J., Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. Proc. 13th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 652-659 (2004).
7. EHRIG, M., HAASE, P., HEFKE, M., STOJANOVIC, N., Similarity for ontologies - a comprehensive framework. Proc. 13th European Conference on Information Systems, May 2005.
8. FOX, M. S., BARBUCEANU, M., GRUNINGER, M., LIN, J., An organization ontology for enterprise modelling. In: M. Prietula et al. (eds.), Simulating organizations: Computational models of institutions and groups, AAAI/MIT Press, 1998, pp. 131-152.
9. GÓMEZ-PÉREZ, A. Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies. Knowl. Sys. Lab., Stanford Univ., 1994.
10. GÓMEZ-PÉREZ, A. Towards a framework to verify knowledge sharing technology. Expert Systems with Applications, 11(4):519- 529 (1996).
11. GROBELNIK, M, MLADENIC, D., Automated Knowledge Discovery in Advanced Knowledge Management, Journal of Knowledge Management, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp. 132-149, 2005.
12. GUARINO, N., WELTY, C., Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Comm. of the ACM, 45(2):61-65, February 2002.
13. HARTMANN, J., SPYNS, P., GIBOIN, A., MAYNARD, D., CUEL, R., SUÁREZ-FIGUEROA, M. C., SURE, Y., Methods for ontology evaluation. KnowledgeWeb (EU-IST Network of Excellence IST- 2004-507482 KWEB), Deliverable D1.2.3, January 2005.
14. HAUSSLER, D., Convolution kernels on discrete structures. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of California at Santa Cruz, 1999.
15. LOZANO-TELLO, A., GÓMEZ-PÉREZ, A., Ontometric: A method to choose the appropriate ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2):1-18 (2004).
16. MAEDCHE, A., STAAB, S., Measuring similarity between ontologies. Proc. 13th CIKM (2002). LNAI vol. 2473.
17. MEILA, M., Comparing clusterings by the variation of information. Proc. 16th Ann. CoLT, 2003.
18. MEILA, M., Comparing clusterings - an axiomatic view. Proc. ICML, 2005.
19. MLADENIC, D., Machine Learning on non-homogeneous, distributed text data. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ljubljana, 1998.
20. MLADENIC, D., GROBELNIK, M., Feature selection on hierarchy of web documents. J. of Decision support systems, 35, 2003, 45-87.
21. PATEL, C., SUPEKAR, K., LEE, Y., PARK, E. K., OntoKhoj: a semantic web portal for ontology searching, ranking and classification. 5th ACM Workshop Web Inf. & Data Mgmt, New Orleans, USA, 2004.
22. PORZEL, R., MALAKA, R., A task-based approach for ontology evaluation. Proc. ECAI 2004 Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, pp. 9-16.
23. RADA, R., MILI, H., BICKNELL, E., BLETTNER, M., Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(1):17-30 (1989).
24. RAND, W. M., Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. of the American Stat. Association, 66:846-850 (1971).
25. SPYNS, P., EvaLexon: Assessing triples mined from texts. Tech. Rpt. 09, STAR Lab, Brussels, 2005.
26. SUPEKAR, K. A peer-review approach for ontology evaluation. Proc. Int. Protégé Conf., Madrid, Spain, 2005.
27. VELARDI, P., NAVIGLI, R., CUCCHIARELLI, A., NERI, F., Evaluation of OntoLearn, a methodology for automatic learning of domain ontologies. In: P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano, B. Magnini (eds.), Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, IOS Press, 2005.
28. VÖLKER, J., VRANDECIC, D., SURE, Y., Automatic evaluation of ontologies (AEON). Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference, 2005.