Incremental utility elicitation for adaptive personalization

Belgian/Netherlands Artificial Intelligence Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 127-134

  Heskes, Tom ^a   De Vries, Bert ^b,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b GN ReSound   (Netherlands)

^c EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION-THEORETIC; MEDICAL DEVICES; OPTIMAL SETTING; PARTIAL INFORMATION; PERSONALIZATIONS; TUNABLE PARAMETER; UTILITY ELICITATIONS; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; OPTIMIZATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84873436133     PISSN: 15687805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. J. Blythe. Visual exploration and incremental utility elicitation. In Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 526-532, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2002. American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
2. C. Boutilier. A POMDP formulation of preference elicitation problems. In Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 239-246, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2002. American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
3. C. Boutilier. On the foundations of expected expected utility. In IJCAI-2003, 2003.
4. R. Bradley and M. Terry. The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39:324-345, 1952.
5. U. Chajewska, D. Roller, and R. Parr. Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pages 363-369. AAAI Press / The MIT Press, 2000.
6. K. Chaloner and I. Verdinelli. Bayesian experimental design: a review. Statistical Science, 10:273-304, 1995.
7. M. Clyde. Experimental design: Bayesian designs. In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, pages 5075-5081. Elsevier, 2004.
8. M. Clyde, P. Müller, and G. Parmigiani. Optimal design for heart defibrillators. In C. Gatsonis, J. Hodges, R. Kass, and N. Singpurwalla, editors, Bayesian Statistics in Science and Engineering: Case Studies II, pages 278-292, New York, NJ, 1995. Springer-Verlag.
9. R. Cyert and M. de Groot. Adaptive utility. In M. Allais and O. Hagen, editors, Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox, pages 223-241. D. Reidel, 1979.
10. S. Dittmer and F. Jensen. Myopic value of information for influence diagrams. In D. Geiger and P. Shenoy, editors, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 142-149, San Francisco, 1997. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
11. P. Fishburn. The foundations of expected utility. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982.
12. S. French. Decision Theory. Halsted Press, New York, 1986.
13. M. Glickman and S. Jensen. Adaptive paired comparison design. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 127:279-293, 2005.
14. M. Hauskrecht. Value-function approximations for partially observable Markov decision processes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 13:33-94, 2000.
15. D. Heckerman, E. Horvitz, and B. Middleton. An approximate nonmyopic computation for value of information. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(3):292-298, 1993.
16. B. Kanninen. Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 39:307-317, 2002.
17. J. Kotecha and P. Djuric. Gaussian particle filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51:2592-2601, 2003.
18. D. Lindley. Bayesian Statistics - A Review. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1972.
19. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1944.
20. T. Wager and E. Nichols. Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm. Neurolmage, 18:293-309, 2003.
21. T. Wang and C. Boutilier. Incremental utility elicitation with the minimax regret decision criterion. In G. Gottlob and T. Walsh, editors, IJCAI-03, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 309-318, San Mateo, CA, 2003. Morgan Kaufmann.
22. E. Wit, A. Nobile, and R. Khanin. Near-optimal design for dual-channel microarray studies. Applied Statistics, in press, 2005.