CORE: A tool for collaborative ontology reuse and evaluation

EON 2006 - Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web: 4th International Workshop - Located at the 15th International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Fernández, Miriam ^a   Cantador, Iván ^a   Castells, Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collaborative filtering; Ontology evaluation; Ontology reuse; Rank fusion; Wordnet

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE FILTERING; COLLABORATIVE ONTOLOGY; FUSION TECHNIQUES; MAIN MODULE; PROBLEM DESCRIPTION; SEMANTIC DOMAINS; SYSTEM USE; THIRD COMPONENT; USER EVALUATIONS; WORDNET;

SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84873435148     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aslam, J. A., Montague, M. Models for metasearch. 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2001). New Orleans, Louisiana, 2001, pp. 276-284.
2. Brank J., Grobelnik M., Mladenić D. A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. SIKDD 2005 at multiconference IS 2005, 17 Oct 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
3. Brewester, C. et al. Data driven ontology evaluation. Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, 2004.
4. Ding, L., et al., Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. Proc. CIKM 2004, pp. 652-659.
5. Fox, E. A., Koushik, M. P., Shaw, J., Modlin, R., Rao, D. Combining evidence from multiple searches. 1st Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 1). Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 1992, pp. 319-328.
6. Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., Lehmann, J. A Theoretical Framework for Ontology Evaluation and Validation. In Proceedings of SWAP 2005.
7. Gomez-Perez, A. Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate Ontologies. In Proceeding of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Los Angeles, CA, February, pp. 299- 305, 1995.
8. Guarino, N., Welty, C. Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM. 45(2):61- 65. New York: ACM Press, 2002.
9. Lee, J. H. Analyses of multiple evidence combination. 20th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 97). New York, 1997, pp. 267-276.
10. Lozano-Tello, A., Gómez-Pérez, A. Ontometric: A method to choose the appropriate ontology. J. Datab. Mgmt., 15(2):1-18 (2004).
11. Maedche, A., Staab, S. Measuring similarity between ontologies. Proc. CIKM 2002. LNAI vol. 2473, pp. 251-263.
12. Masthoff J. Group modeling: Selecting a Sequence of Television Items to Suit a Group of Viewers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14: 37-85, 2004.
13. Miller, G. WordNet: A lexical database. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39-41. 1995.
14. Montaner M., López B., De la Rosa J.L. A Taxonomy of Recommended Agents on the Internet. Artificial intelligence Review 19: 285-330, 2003.
15. Paslaru, E. Using Context Information to Improve Ontology Reuse. Doctoral Workshop at the 17th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering CAiSE'05.
16. Porzel, R., Malaka, R. A task-based approach for ontology evaluation. ECAI 2004 Workshop Ont. Learning and Population.
17. Protégé OWL ontology Repository. protege.stanford.edu/ plugins/owl/owl-library/index.html.
18. Renda, M. E., Straccia, U. Web metasearch: rank vs. score based rank aggregation methods. ACM symposium on Applied Computing. Melbourne, Florida, 2003, pp. 841-846.
19. Resnick P. et al. GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. Internal Research Report, MIT Center for Coordination Science, March 1994.
20. Sure Y., Erdmann M., Angele J., Staab S., Studer R., Wenke D. "OntoEdit: Collaborative Ontology Development for the Semantic Web". ISWC 2002.
21. Velardi, P., et al. Evaluation of OntoLearn, a methodology for automatic learning of domain ontologies. In Ont. Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, IOS Press, 2005.