Topic-specific trust and open rating systems: An approach for ontology evaluation

EON 2006 - Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web: 4th International Workshop - Located at the 15th International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Lewen, Holger ^a   Supekar, Kaustubh ^b   Noy, Natalya F ^b   Musen, Mark A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT APPLICATIONS; KEYWORD-BASED SEARCH; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERS; OPEN RATING SYSTEMS;

METADATA; WORLD WIDE WEB;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 84873427316     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. J. Brank and M. Grobelnik. A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In Proc. of the 8th International mulit-conference Information Society IS, pages 166-169, 2005.
2. L. Ding, T. Finin, A. Joshi, R. Pan, R. S. Cost, Y. Peng, P. Reddivari, V. C. Doshi, and J. Sachs. Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In Proc. of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 652-659. ACM Press, NOV 2004.
3. J. Golbeck. Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks. PhD thesis, University of Maryland. College Park, MD, 2005.
4. A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernández-López, and O. Corcho. Ontological Engineering. Springer, London, U.K., 2003.
5. R. Guha. Open rating systems. Technical report, Stanford University, CA, USA, 2003.
6. R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In Proc. of the Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference, MAY 2004.
7. J. Hartmann, Y. Sure, P. Haase, R. Palma, and M. del Carmen Surez-Figueroa. Omv - ontology metadata vocabulary. In C. Welty, editor, ISWC 2005 - In Ontology Patterns for the Semantic Web, NOV 2005.
8. A. Lozano-Tello and A. Gómez-Pérez. Ontometric: A method to choose the appropriate ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2):1-18, APR-JUN 2004. Special Issue on Ontological analysis, Evaluation, and Engineering of Business Systems Analysis Methods.
9. D. L. McGuinness. Ontologies come of age. In D. Fensel, J. Hendler, H. Lieberman, and W. Wahlster, editors, Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press, 2002.
10. N. F. Noy, R. Guha, and M. A. Musen. User ratings of ontologies: Who will rate the raters? In Proc. of the AAAI 2005 Spring Symposium on Knowledge Collection from Volunteer Contributors, Stanford, CA, 2005.
11. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford University, CA, USA, 1998.
12. C. Patel, K. Supekar, Y. Lee, and E. Park. Ontokhoj: A semantic web portal for ontology searching, ranking and classification. In Proc. of the Fifth ACM Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, pages 58-61, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
13. K. Supekar and M. Musen. Knowledge zone: A public repository of peer-reviewed biomedical ontologies. submitted to AMIA Annual Symposium, Washington DC, USA, 11-15 November 2006.
14. K. Supekar, N. Noy, D. Rubin, and M. Musen. Ontology of ontology to support ontology search and evaluation. submitted to AMIA Annual Symposium, Washington DC, USA, 11-15 November 2006.
15. K. Supekar, C. Patel, and Y. Lee. Characterizing quality of knowledge on semantic web. In Proc. of the Seventeenth International FLAIRS Conference, pages 220-228, Miami, Florida, USA, MAY 2004.
16. M. Uschold, M. Healy, K. Williamson, P. Clark, and S. Woods. Ontology reuse and application. In Proc. of the International Conference on Formal Ontology and Information Systems FOIS'98, pages 179-192, 1998.
17. C. Welty and N. Guarino. Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 39:51-74, 2001.