Defining diagnostic tissue in the era of personalized medicine

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 185, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 135-139

  Cheung, Carol C ^a   Martin, Bella R ^a   Asa, Sylvia L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC TISSUE; EXCISION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; LICENSING; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; TISSUES;

EID: 84873400537     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120565     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hospitals Act, RSM 1987, c. H120.
2. Hospitals Act, RSPEI 1988, c H-10.1.
3. Hospitals Act, RS 1989, c. 208.
4. Hospital Act, SNB 1992, c H-6.1.
5. Hospitals Act, RSA 2000, c. H12.
6. Public Hospitals Act, RRO 1990, Regulation 965, ss. 20 (2) 3, 31(1), 31 (2).
7. Ontario Laboratory Accreditation requirements. In: Post-analytical process. Toronto (ON): Quality Management Program - Laboratory Services; 2011.
8. Weinrib E. Tort law: cases and materials. 3rd ed. Toronto (ON): Emond Montgomery Publications; 2008. p. 792.
9. McInerney v. MacDonald [1992] 2 SCR 138.
10. Canadian Medical Association. The medical record: confidentiality, access and disclosure (update 2000). Ottawa (ON): The Association; 2000.
11. Canadian Medical Association. Principles for the protection of patients' personal health information. Ottawa (ON): The Association; 2011.
12. Allen MJ, Powers ML, Gronowski KS, et al. Human tissue ownership and use in research: what laboratorians and researchers should know. Clin Chem 2010;56:1675-82.
13. Moore v. Regents of University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120, 132-133
14. P.2d 479, 486
15. Cal. Rptr. 1990;146:153.
16. Mossman MJ, Flanagan W. Property law: cases and commentary. 2nd ed. Toronto (ON): Emond Montgomery Publications; 2004.
17. Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute, 264 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (S. D. Fla. 2003).
18. Hakimian R, Korn D. Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research. JAMA 2004;292:2500-5.
19. Washington University v. Catalona, 490 F.3d 667 (8th Cir. 2007).
20. Dry S. Who owns diagnostic tissue blocks? Lab Med 2009;40:69-73.
21. del Carmen MG, Joffe S. Informed consent for medical treatment and research: a review. Oncologist 2005;10:636-41.
22. Elger BS, Caplan AL. Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: Differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework. EMBO Rep 2006;7:661-6.
23. Hopp v. Lepp, [1980] 2 S. C. R. 192.
24. Reibl v. Hughes, [1980] 2 S. C. R. 880.
25. US National Institutes of Health. Nuremberg Code. Available: http://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf (accessed 2012 June 28).
26. World Medical Association. The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ferney-Voltaire (France): The Association; 2008.
27. US Department of Health & Human Services. The Belmont Report. Available: www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html (accessed 2012 June 28).
28. Bertholf RL. Protecting human research subjects. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2001;31:119-27.
29. Harnett JD, Neuman R. Research ethics for clinical researchers. Methods Mol Biol 2009;473:285-97.
30. Tri-Council Policy Statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; 2010.
31. Caulfield TA, Ries NM. Consent, privacy and confidentiality in longitudinal, population health research: the Canadian legal context. Health Law J 2004; (Suppl): 1.
32. Bathe OF, McGuire AL. The ethical use of existing samples for genome research. Genet Med 2009;11:712-5.
33. Giannini C, Oelkers MM, Edwards WD, et al. Maintaining clinical tissue archives and supporting human research: challenges and solutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:347-53.