Central correlates of impaired information processing in people with spinal cord injury

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 59-65

  Lazzaro, Ilario ^a   Tran, Yvonne ^a   Wijesuriya, Nirupama ^a   Craig, Ashley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; P300; Paraplegia; Spinal cord injury; Tetraplegia

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTICONVULSIVE AGENT; ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; HYPNOTIC AGENT; SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG USE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; PARAPLEGIA; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; QUADRIPLEGIA; RESPONSE TIME; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARAPLEGIA; QUADRIPLEGIA; REACTION TIME; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 84873374596     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: 15371603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31827edb0c     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alkadhi H, Brugger P, Hotz-Boendermaker S, et al. What disconnection tells about motor imagery: evidence from paraplegic patients. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:131-140.
2. Allison T, Puce A, Mc Carthy G. Category-sensitive excitatory and inhibitory processes in human extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol 2002;88:2864-2868.
3. Ament PA, Cohen MJ, Schandler SL, et al. Auditory P3 event related potentials (ERP) and brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) after spinal cord injury in humans. J Spinal Cord Med 1995;18:208-215.
4. Berger A, Posner MI. Pathologies of brain attentional networks. Neurosci Biobe-hav Rev 2000;24:3-5.
5. Boord P, Siddall PJ, Tran Y, et al. Electroencephalographic slowing and reduced reactivity in neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008;46:118-123.
6. Bruehlmeier M, Dietz V, Leenders KL, et al. How does the human brain deal with a spinal cord injury? Eur JNeurosci 1998;10:3918-3922.
7. Cohen MJ, Schandler SL, Vulpe M. Event-related brain potentials during orienting to auditory and visual stimulation in spinal cord injured humans. Paraplegia 1992;30:864-871.
8. Cohen MJ, Ament PA, Schandler SL, et al. Changes in the P300 component of the tactile event-related potential following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1996;34:107-112.
9. Cohen HL, Porjesz B, Begleiter H, et al. Neurophysiological correlates of response production and inhibition in alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997;21:1398-1406.
10. Cotter I. Cognitive impairment following SCI: implications for rehabilitation. In: Craig A, Tran Y, eds. Psychological aspects associated with spinal cord injury rehabilitation: new directions and best evidence. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2008:175-195.
11. Craig A, Tran Y, Middleton J. Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2009;47:108-114.
12. Cramer SC, Lastra L, Lacourse MG, et al. Brain motor system function after chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Brain 2005;128:2941-2950.
13. Curt A, Bruehlmeier M, Leenders KL, et al. Differential effects of spinal cord injury and functional impairment on human brain activation. J Neurotrauma 2002a;19:43-51.
14. Curt A, Alkadhi H, Crelier GR, et al. Changes ofnon-affected upper limb cortical representation in paraplegic patients as assessed by f MRI. Brain 2002b;125:2567-2578.
15. Davey NJ, Smith HC, Wells E, et al. Responses ofthenar muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:80-87.
16. Davidoff GN, Roth EJ, Richards JS. Cognitive deñcits in spinal cord injury: epidemiology and outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:275-284.
17. Di Russo F, Bultrini A, Brunelli S, et al. Beneñts of sports participation for executive function in disabled athletes. J Neurotrauma 2010;27:2309-2319.
18. Dowler RN, O'Brien SA, Haaland KY, et al. Neuropsychological functioning following a spinal cord injury. Appl Neuropsychol 1995;2:124-129.
19. Dowler RN, Harrington DL, Haaland KY, et al. Profiles of cognitive functioning in chronic spinal cord injury and the role of moderating variables. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:464-472.
20. Dunn BR, Dunn DA, Languis M, et al. The relation of ERP components to complex memory processing. Brain Cogn 1998;36:355-376.
21. Garavan H, Ross TJ, Stein EA. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8301-8306.
22. Garavan H, Ross TJ, Murphy K, et al. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control ofbehavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction. Neu-roimage 2002;17:1820-1829.
23. Gordon E. Integrative neuroscience: the big picture. In: Gordon E, ed. Integrative Neuroscience. Bringing together biological, psychological and clinical mod-els of the human brain. Harwood Academic Publishers, 2000:1-28.
24. Gordon E. Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatry. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry 2002;7:42-53.
25. Gourab K, Schmit BD. Changes in movement-related ß-band EEG signals in human spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:2017-2023.
26. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;55:468-484.
27. Green JB, St Arnold PA, Rozhkov L, et al. Bereitschaft (readiness potential) and supplemental motor area interaction in movement generation: spinal cord injury and normal subjects. JRehabil Res Dev 2003;40:225-234.
28. Herbert D, Tran Y, Craig A, et al. Altered brain wave activity in persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Int J Neurosci 2007;117:1731-1746.
29. Hess DW, Marwitz JH, Kreutzer JS. Neuropsychological impairments after spinal cord injury: a comparative study with mild traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2003;48:151-156.
30. Hotz-Boendermaker S, Funk M, Summers P, et al. Preservation ofmotorprograms in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. Neuroimage 2008;39:383-394.
31. Intriligator J, Polich J. On the relationship between EEG and ERP variability. Int J Psychophysiol 1995;20:59-74.
32. Jasiukaitis P, Hakerem G. The effect of prestimulus alpha activity on the P300. Psychophysiology 1988;25:157-165.
33. Kotchoubey B, Dubischar A, Mack H, et al. Electrocortical and behavioral effects of chronic immobility on word processing. Cognit Brain Res 2003;17:188-199.
34. Lacourse MG, Cohen MJ, Lawrence KE, et al. Cortical potentials during imagined movements in individuals with chronic spinal cord injuries. Behav Brain Res 1999;104:73-88.
35. Lijffijt M, Lane SD, Meier SL, et al. P50, N100 and P200 sensory gating: relation-ships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory. Psycho-physiology 2009;46:1059-1068.
36. Lotze M, Laubis-Herrmann U, Topka H. Combination of TMS and f MRI reveals a specific pattern of reorganization in M1 in patients after complete spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2006;24:97-107.
37. Middleton J, Tran Y, Craig A. Relationship between quality of life and self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1643-1648.
38. Middleton JW, Leong G, Mann L. Management of spinal cord injury in general practice-Part 1. Aust Fam Physician 2008a;37:229-233.
39. Middleton JW, Leong G, Mann L. Management of spinal cord injury in general practice-Part 2. Aust Fam Physician 2008b;37:331-338.
40. Nicotra A, Catley M, Ellaway PH, et al. The ability of physiological stimuli to generate the sympathetic skin response in human chronic spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2005;23:331-339.
41. Oades RD, Zerbin D, Dittmann-Balcar A, et al. Auditory event-related potential (ERP) and difference-wave topography in schizophrenic patients with/with-out active hallucinations and delusions: a comparison with young obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and healthy subjects. Int J Psychophysiol 1996;22:185-214.
42. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:2128-2148.
43. Raineteau O, Schwab ME. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:263-273.
44. Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG. Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology 1983;20:168-179.
45. Roelcke U, Curt A, Otte A, et al. Influence of spinal cord injury on cerebral senso-rimotor systems: a PET study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;62:61-65.
46. Roy FD, Zewdie ET, Gorassini MA. Short-interval intracortical inhibition with incomplete spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:1387-1395.
47. Smith HC, Savic G, Frankel HL, et al. Corticospinal function studied over time following incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2000;38:292-300.
48. Soltani M, Knight RT. Neural origins of the P300. Crit Rev Neurobiol 2000;14:199-224.
49. Stutts M, Kreutzer JS, Barth JT, et al. Cognitive impairment in persons with recent spinal cord injury: findings and implications for clinical practice. Neuro Re-habil 1991;1:79-85.
50. Tran Y, Boord P, Middleton J, et al. Levels of brain wave activity (8-13 Hz) in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004;42:73-79.
51. Williams LM. An integrative neuroscience model of "significance processing". JIntegr Neurosci 2006;5:1-47.
52. Wydenkeller S, Maurizio S, Dietz V, et al. Neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: significance of clinical and electrophysiological measures. Eur J Neurosci 2009;30:91-99.