Examining the measurement of novel drug perceptions: Salvia divinorum, gender, and peer substance use

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 48, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 65-72

  Miller, Bryan Lee ^a   Boman, John H ^b   Stogner, John ^a  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Novel drugs; Peer delinquency; Perceptions; Projection; Salvia divinorum

Indexed keywords

STREET DRUG;

ADULT; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SALVIA; SELF MEDICATION; SELF REPORT; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; DRUG USERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PEER GROUP; SALVIA; SELF MEDICATION; SELF REPORT; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES; STREET DRUGS;

EID: 84873362427     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: 15322491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2012.723956     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
2. Argyle, M.&Lu, L. (1990). Happiness and social skills. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1255-1261.
3. Aseltine, R. H., Jr. (1995). A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 103-121.
4. Boman, J., Stogner, J. M., Miller, B. L., Griffin, O. H., III., & Krohn, M. D. (2011). On the operational validity of perceptual peer delinquency measurement: Exploring projection and elements contained in perceptions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 150-151. doi: 10.1177/0022427811419367.
5. Burke, W. W. (1986). Leadership as empowering others. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), Executive power: How executives influence people and organizations (pp. 51-77). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Byrne, D.,&Blaylock, B. (1963). Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 636-640.
7. Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). Lifelines and risk: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge.
8. Druskat, V. U. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the roman catholic church. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 99-119.
9. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A socialrole interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Pugh, M. D. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1170-1202.
11. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1987). The Methodological adequacy of longitudinal research on crime. Criminology, 25, 581-614.
12. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Griffin, III, O. H., Miller, B. L., & Khey, D. N. (2008). Legally high? Legal considerations of salvia divinorum. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 40, 183-191.
14. Groves, K. S. (2005). Gender differences in social and emotional skills and charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, 30-46.
15. Grundmann, O., Phipps, S. M., Zadezensksy, I., & Butterweck, V. (2007). Salvia divinorum and salvinorin A: An update on pharmacology and analytical methodology of salvia divinorum. Planta Medica, 73, 1039-1046.
16. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Haynie, D. L. 2002. Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99-134.
18. Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, W. D. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109-1130.
19. Heimer, K. (1996). Gender, interaction, and delinquency: Testing a theory of differential social control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 39-61.
20. Iannotti, R. J., & Bush, P. J. (1992). Perceived vs. actual friends' use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, and cocaine: Which has the most influence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 375-389.
21. Jussim, L.,&Osgood, D.W. (1989). Influence and similarity among friends: An integrative model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 98-112.
22. Kandel, D. B. (1978a). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427-436.
23. Kandel, D. B. (1978b). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306-312.
24. Kandel, D. B. (1980). Drug and drinking behavior among youth. In J. Coleman, A. Inkeles, & N. Smelser (Eds.), Annual review of sociology: Vol. 6 (pp. 235-285 ). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
25. Kandel, D. B.,&Davies,M. (1991). Friendship networks, intimacy, and illicit drug use in young adulthood: A comparison of two competing theories. Criminology, 29, 441-469.
26. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
27. Khey, D. N., Miller, B. L., & Griffin, O. H., III. (2008). Salvia divinorum use among college students. Journal of Drug Education, 38, 297-306.
28. King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137-163.
29. Lange, J. E., Reed, M. B., Ketchie Croff, J. M., & Clapp, J. D. (2008). College student use of salvia divinorum. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 94, 263-266.
30. Maccoby, E. E. 1990. Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513-520.
31. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
32. Maccoby, E. E., Johnson, J. P., & Church, R. M. (1958). Community integration and the social control of juvenile delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 14, 38-51.
33. McGloin, J. M., & O'Neill Shermer, L. (2009). Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 35-72.
34. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
35. Meldrum, R. C., Young, J. T. N., &Weerman, F. M. (2009). Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 353-376.
36. Miller, B. L., Griffin, O. H., III, Gibson, C. L., & Khey, D. N. (2009). Trippin' on sally D: Exploring predictors of salvia divinorum experimentation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 396-403.
37. Miller, B. L., Stogner, J., Khey, D. N., Akers, R. L., Boman, J., & Griffin, O. H., III. (2011). Magic mint, the internet, and peer associations: A test of social learning theory using patterns of Salvia divinorum use. Journal of Drug Issues, 41, 305-326.
38. Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process.NewYork, NY: Rinehart and Winston.
39. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
40. Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Winfree, L. T., Jr., Madensen, T. D., Daigle, L. E., et al. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765-802.
41. Prisinzano, T. E. (2005). Psychopharmacology of the hallucinogenic sage salvia divinorum. Life Sciences, 78, 527-531.
42. Ridgeway, C., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191-216.
43. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 157-177.
44. Siebert, D. J. (1994). Salvia divinorum and salvinorin A: New pharmacologic findings. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 43, 53-56.
45. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies (SAMHSA). (2008). The NSDUH report: Use of specific hallucinogens: 2006. Rockville, MD: Author.
46. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (1997). Peers, drug use, and delinquency. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 218-233 ). New York, NY: Wiley.
47. Young, J. T. N., Barnes, J. C., Meldrum, R. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2011). Assessing and explaining misperceptions of peer delinquency. Criminology, 49, 599-630.
48. Zhang, L., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The effects of alternative measures of delinquent peers on self-reported delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 323-337.