MR enterography versus MR enteroclysis

Radiology

Volumn 266, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 688-689

  Arrivé, Lionel ^a   Mouhadi, Sanaâ El ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE DISTENSION; LETTER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENTEROCLYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENTEROGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

HUMANS; INTESTINAL DISEASES; INTESTINE, SMALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 84873356689     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12121840     Document Type: Letter

References (15)

1. Masselli G, Gualdi G. MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 2012;264(2):333-348.
2. Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2(6):491-497.
3. Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2007;17(9):2294-2301.
4. Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi G. Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn's disease. Eur Radiol 2008;18(3):438-447.
5. Cappabianca S, Granata V, Di Grezia G, et al. The role of nasoenteric intubation in the MR study of patients with Crohn's disease: our experience and literature review. Radiol Med (Torino) 2011;116(3):389-406.
6. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al. Imaging of small intestinal Crohn's disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006;16(9):1915-1925.
7. Umschaden H W, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical fndings. Radiology 2000;215(3):717-725.
8. Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A, et al. Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fuoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 2005;54(12):1721-1727.
9. Van Weyenberg SJ, Bouman K, Jacobs MA, et al. Comparison of MR enteroclysis with video capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small-intestinal disease. Abdom Imaging doi:10.1007/s00261-012-9892-4. Published online April 18, 2012. Accessed September 5, 2012.
10. Jensen MD, Nathan T, Rafaelsen SR, Kjeldsen J. Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy for small bowel Crohn's disease is superior to that of MR enterography or CT enterography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9(2):124-129.
11. Gupta A, Postgate AJ, Burling D, et al. A prospective study of MR enterography versus capsule endoscopy for the surveillance of adult patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(1):108-116.
12. Van Weyenberg SJ, Van Waesberghe JH, Ell C, Pohl J. Enteroscopy and its relationship to radiological small bowel imaging. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2009;19(3):389-407.
13. Masselli G, Polettini E, Casciani E, Bertini L, Vecchioli A, Gualdi G. Small-bowel neoplasms: prospective evaluation of MR enteroclysis. Radiology 2009;251(3):743-750.
14. Van Weyenberg SJ, Meijerink MR, Jacobs MA, et al. MR enteroclysis in the diagnosis of small-bowel neoplasms. Radiology 2010;254(3):765-773.
15. Umschaden H W, Gasser J. MR enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41(2):231-248.