Using information quality for the identification of relevant web data sources: A proposal

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 36-44

  Lóscio, Bernadette Farias ^a   Batista, Maria C M ^b   Souza, Damires ^c   Salgado, Ana Carolina ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^c Science and Technology of Paraíba IFPB   (Brazil)

Author keywords

information quality; relevant data source; web application

Indexed keywords

ANSWERING QUERIES; DATA-SOURCES; DOMAIN-SPECIFIC APPLICATION; GENERIC DATA; INFORMATION QUALITY; RELEVANT DATA SOURCE; USER NEED; USER REQUIREMENTS; WEB APPLICATION; WEB DATA SOURCES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; WEB SERVICES;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 84873337268     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2428736.2428747     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. David Aumueller, Hong-Hai Do, Sabine Massmann, and Erhard Rahm. 2005. Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (SIGMOD '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 906-908. DOI=10.1145/1066157.1066283 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1066157. 1066283
2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi D., and Patel-Schneider P. 2003. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
3. Batista, M. C. M. Otimização de Acesso em um Sistema de Integração de Dados através do uso de Caching e Materialização de Dados, Master Thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco, 2003.
4. Batista, M. C. M. Schema Quality Analysis in a Data Integration System. PhD Thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco, 2008.
5. Bleiholder, J. and Naumann, F. Data fusion. ACM Comput. Surv., 41, 1, Article 1, 2008. DOI = 10.1145/1456650.1456651 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 1456650.1456651
6. Borgida A. and Serafini L. 2003. Distributed description logics: Assimilating information from peer sources. Journal of Data Semantics, 1:153-184.
7. LNCS 2800, Springer Verlag, 2003.
8. Cafarella, M. J., Halevy, A. Y., Madhavan J. 2011. Structured data on the web. Commun. ACM. 54, 2 (January 2011), 72-79. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10. 1145/1897816.1897839
9. Castano S., Ferrara, A., and Montanelli, S. 2006. Matching ontologies in open networked systems: Techniques and applications. Journal on Data Semantics, 3870: 25-63, 2006.
10. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429-444, 1978
11. Daas, P.J.H. and Ossen, S.J.L. 2011. Metadata Quality Evaluation of Secondary Data Sources. In Proceedings of 5th International Quality Conference, Center for Quality, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kragujevac. 2011.
12. Dustdar, S., Pichler, R., Savenkov, V. and Truong, H.L. Quality-aware service-oriented data integration: requirements, state of the art and open challenges. SIGMOD Rec. 41, 1, 2012. DOI=10.1145/2206869.2206873 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2206869.2206873
13. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P. Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
14. Ge, M. and Helfert, M. 2007. A Review of Information Quality Research - Develop a Research Agenda, In Proceedings of 12th ICIQ, 2007.
15. Herden, O. 2001. Measuring Quality of Database Schema by Reviewing - Concept, Criteria and Tool. In Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software Engineering, p. 59-70, 2001.
16. Jarke, M., Jeusfeld, M.A., Quix, C. and Vassiliadis, P. Architecture and Quality in Data Warehouses: An Extended Repository Approach, in: Information Systems 24 (3), p. 229-253, 1999.
17. Jeffery S. R., Franklin M. J., Halevy A. Y. 2007. Soliciting User Feedback in a Dataspace System. Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley, 2007.
18. Keeton, K., Mehra, P., Wilkes, J. 2009. Do you know your IQ? A research agenda for information quality in systems. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review. 37, 3 (December 2009). 26-31. DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1710115. 1710121
19. Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Khan, B. K. and Wang, R. Y. AIMQ: A Methodology for Information Quality Assessment, in: Information & Management 40 (2), p. 133-146, 2002.
20. Naumann, F. Leser, U. and Freytag, J. C. Quality-driven integration of heterogenous information systems. In Proc. of the 25th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'99), pages 447-458, 1999.
21. Naumann, F. Quality-Driven Query Answering for Integrated Information Systems, in: LNCS 2261, 2002.
22. Naumann, F., Freytag, J.C. and Leser, U. 2004. Completeness of Integrated Information Sources, Information Systems, 29, 7 (October 2004), 583-615. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2003.12.005
23. Nikolov, A., d'Aquin, M. 2011. Identifying Relevant Sources for Data Linking using a Semantic Web Index. In Proceedings of the Linked Data on the Web, LDOW 2011, Hyderabad, India.
24. Oliveira, H. R., Tavares, A. T., Lóscio, B. F. 2012. Feedback-based Data Set Recommendation for Building Linked Data Applications. In Proceedings of 8th Int. Conference on Semantic Systems (Vienna, Austria, September 5-7, 2012) I-SEMANTICS 2012.
25. Olson, J.E. 2003. Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension. Morgan Kaufmann.
26. Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. and Wang, R. Data Quality Assessment, in: ACM 45 (4), p. 211-218, 2002.
27. nd International Conference on Data Management in Grid and P2P Systems (Linz, Austria, September 1-2, 2009), GLOBE 2009, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 124-135. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03715-3- 11
28. Price, R. and Shanksa, G. Semiotic Information Quality Framework, in: DSS, p.658-672, 2004.
29. Redman, T. C. Data Quality for the Information Age, in: Artech House, 1996.
30. Scannapieco, M. and Catarci, T. Data Quality under a Computer Science Perspective, Journal of Archivi & Computer, 2003.
31. Scannapieco, M. Data Quality at a Glance, in: Datenbank-Spektrum 14, p. 6-14, 2005.
32. Souza D., Arruda T., Salgado A. C., Tedesco P., and Kedad, Z.: Using Semantics to Enhance Query Reformulation in Dynamic Environments. In: 13th East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS'09), Riga, Latvia, pp. 78-92 (2009).
33. Talukdar, P. P., Ives, Z. G., Pereira, F. 2010. Automatically incorporating new sources in keyword search-based data integration. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Indianapolis, Indiana, June 6-11, 2010) SIGMOD 2010, ACM, New York, NY, 387-398. DOI = , http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1807167.1807211
34. Wang, D. Z., Dong, X. L., Das Sarma, A., Franklin, M. J., Halevy, A. Y. 2009. Functional Dependency Generation and Applications in Pay-as-you-go Data Integration Systems. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on the Web and Databases (Providence, Rhode Island, June 28, 2009) WebDB 2009.
35. Wang, R. Y. and Strong, D. M. Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers, in: JMIS 12 (4), p. 5-33, 1996.
36. Wand, Y and Wang, R.Y. Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations, in: ACM, 39 (11), p. 86-95, 1996.
37. Zhu, Y. and Buchmann, A. Evaluating and Selecting Web Sources as External Information Resources of a Data Warehouse. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE' 2002), Singapore, 2002.