Analyzing the cost and benefit of pair programming

Proceedings - International Software Metrics Symposium

Volumn 2003-January, Issue , 2003, Pages 166-177

  Padberg, F ^a   Muller M M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Displays; Electric breakdown; Keyboards; Mice; Personnel; Productivity; Programming profession; Time to market; Velocity measurement

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; DISPLAY DEVICES; ELECTRIC BREAKDOWN; PERSONNEL; PRODUCTIVITY; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TYPEWRITER KEYBOARDS; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

BREAKDOWN STRUCTURES; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; EXTREME PROGRAMMING; MICE; PROGRAMMING PROFESSION; REALISTIC SCENARIO; TEAM PRODUCTIVITIES; TIME TO MARKET;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84873272722     PISSN: 15301435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/METRIC.2003.1232465     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. K. Beck. Embracing change with extreme programming. IEEE Computer, pages 70-77, Oct. 1999.
2. K. Beck. Extreme Programming Explained. Addison Wesley, 1999.
3. D. Bisant and J. Lyle. A two-person inspection method to improve programming productivity. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(10):1294-1304, Oct. 1989.
4. A. Cockburn and L. Williams. The costs and benefits of pair programming. In eXtreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering XP2000, Cagliari, Italy, June 2000.
5. H. Erdogmus. Comparative evaluation of software development strategies based on net present value. In International Workshop on Economics-Driven Software Engineering Research EDSER, Los Angeles, USA, May 1999.
6. W. Harrison, D. Raffo, and J. Settle. Measuring the value from improved predictions of software process improvement outcomes using risk-based discount rates. In International Workshop on Economics-Driven Software Engineering Research EDSER, Los Angeles, USA, May 1999.
7. W. Humphrey. Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, 1989.
8. W. Humphrey. A Discipline for Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, 1997.
9. M. M. Müller and F. Padberg. Extreme programming from an engineering economics point of view. In International Workshop on Economics-Driven Software Engineering Research EDSER, Orlando, Florida, May 2002.
10. J. Nosek. The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM, 41(3):105-108, Mar. 1998.
11. J. Smith and T. Menzies. Should NASA embrace agile processes, 2002. preprint, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
12. I. Sommerville. Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, 1996.
13. L. Williams and H. Erdogmus. On the economic feasibility of pair programming. InInternational Workshop on Economics-Driven Software Engineering Research EDSER, Orlando, Florida, May 2002.
14. L. Williams, R. Kessler, W. Cunningham, and R. Jeffries. Strengthening the case for pair-programming. IEEE Software, pages 19-25, July/Aug. 2000.