Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA

Journal of Geographical Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 280-296

  Kumar, Sandeep ^a   Lal, Rattan ^b   Liu, Desheng ^b   Rafiq, Rashid ^c  

^a SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

geographically weighted regression; major land resource areas; multiple linear regression; root mean square error; soil organic carbon

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873272053     PISSN: 1009637X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11442-013-1010-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams W A, 1973. The effect of organic matter on the bulk and true densities of some uncultivated podzolic soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 24: 10-17.
2. Agterberg F P, 1984. Trend surface analysis. In: Gaile G L, Willmott C J eds. Spatial Statistics and Models. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 147-171.
3. Batjes N H, 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 47: 151-163.
4. Bellamy P H, Loveland P J, Bradley R I et al., 2005. Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978-2003. Nature, 437: 245-248.
5. Bouchard V, Cochran M, 2006. Wetland and carbon sequestration. In: Lal R ed. Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Vol. 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1887-1890.
6. Calhoun F G, Smeck N E, Slater B K et al., 2001. Predicting bulk density of Ohio soils from morphology, genetic principles and laboratory characterization data. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65: 811-819.
7. Cliff A D, Ord J K, 1973. Spatial Autocorrelation: Monographs in Spatial and Environmental Systems Analysis. London: Pion Limited.
8. Consortium M-R L C, 2007. 2001 National land cover data.
9. Daly C, Taylor G H, Gibson W P et al., 2001. High quality spatial climate data sets for the United States and beyond. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43: 1957-1962.
10. Eldeiry A A, Garcia L A, 2010. Comparison of ordinary kriging, regression kriging, and cokriging techniques to estimate soil salinity using Landsat images. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-Asce, 136: 355-364.
11. Fotheringham A S, Brunsdon C, Charlton M, 2002. Geographically weighted regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
12. Ge V Y, Thomasson J A, Morgan C L et al., 2007. VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for agricultural soil property determination based on regression-kriging. Transactions of the ASABE, 50: 1081-1092.
13. Grigal D F, McRoberts R E, Ohmann L F, 1991. Spatial variation in chemical properties of forest floor and surface mineral soil in the North Central United States. Soil Science, 151: 282-290.
14. Guo Y Y, Amundson R, Gong P et al., 2006. Quantity and spatial variability of soil carbon in the conterminous United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70: 590-600.
15. Hengl T, Heuvelink G B M, Rossiter D G, 2007. About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies. Computers and Geosciences, 33: 1301-1315.
16. Hengl T, Heuvelink G B M, Stein A, 2004. A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression kriging. Geoderma, 120: 75-93.
17. Jenny H, 1941. Factors of Soil Formation, A System of Quantitative Pedology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Jones C, McConnell C, Coleman K et al., 2005. Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil. Global Change Biology, 11: 154-166.
19. Kern J S, 1994. Spatial patterns of soil organic carbon in the contiguous United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 439-455.
20. Knowles T A, Singh B, 2003. Carbon storage in cotton soils in northern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 41: 889-903.
21. Lal R, 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304: 1623-1627.
22. Lal R, Kimble J, Follett R F et al., 1998. The Potential for U. S. Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. Ann Arbor, MI: Sleeping Bear Press, 1-128.
23. Lantz A, Lal R, Kimble J, 2001. Land use effects on soil carbon pools in two major land resource areas of Ohio, USA. In: Stott R H M D E, Steinhardt G C eds. Sustaining the Global Farm. Purdue Un iversity, 499-502.
24. Lloyd C D, 2010. Analysing population characteristics using geographically weighted principal components analysis: A case study of Northern Ireland in 2001. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 34: 389-399.
25. McBratney A B, Santos M L M, Minasny B, 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 117: 3-52.
26. Mennis J, 2006. Mapping the results of geographically weighted regression. The Cartographic Journal, 43: 171-179.
27. Minasny B, McBratney A B, Mendonca-Santos M L et al., 2006. Prediction and digital mapping of soil carbon storage in the Lower Namoi Valley. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 44: 223-244.
28. Moran P A P, 1973. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37: 17-23.
29. Mueller T G, Pierce F J, 2003. Soil carbon maps: Enhancing spatial estimates with simple terrain attributes at multiple scales. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67: 258-267.
30. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook.
31. Odeh I O A, McBratney A B, Chittleborough D J, 1994. Spatial prediction of soil properties from landform attributes derived from a digital elevation model. Geoderma, 63: 197-214.
32. Odeh I O A, McBratney A B, Chittleborough D J, 1995. Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: Heterotopic cokriging and regression-kriging. Geoderma, 67: 215-226.
33. Páez A, 2004. Anisotropic variance functions in geographically weighted regression models. Geographical Analysis, 36: 299-314.
34. Post W M, Peng T H, Emanuel W R et al., 1990. The global carbon cycle. American Scientist, 78: 310-326.
35. Qualls R G, Richardson C J, 2008. Decomposition of litter and peat in the Everglades. Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
36. 2O dynamics in humid temperate grassland? Geoderma, 181/182: 36-44.
37. Saetre P, 1999. Spatial patterns of ground vegetation, soil microbial biomass and activity in a mixed spruce-birch stand. Ecography, 22: 183-192.
38. Spain A V, Isbell R F, Probert M E, 1983. Soil organic matter. Soils, an Australian Viewpoint. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO/London, UK: Academic Press.
39. Tan Z, Lal R, Smeck N E et al., 2004. Taxonomic and geographic distribution of soil organic carbon pools in Ohio. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68: 1896-1904.
40. Thompson J A, Kolka R K, 2005. Soil carbon storage estimation in a forested watershed using quantitative soil landscape modeling. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69: 1086-1093.
41. Webster R, Oliver M A, 2007. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Wheeler D C, 2009. Simultaneous coefficient penalization and model selection in geographically weighted regression: The geographically weighted lasso. Environmental and Planning A, 41: 722-742.
43. Wheeler D C, Páez A, 2010. Geographically Weighted Regression. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Publ.
44. Wills S A, Burras C L, Sandor J A, 2007. Prediction of soil organic carbon content using field and laboratory measurements of soil color. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71: 380-388.
45. Wilson K B, Meyers T P, 2001. The spatial variability of energy and carbon dioxide fluxes at the floor of a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 98: 443-473.
46. Zinn Y L, Lal R, Resck D V S, 2005. Texture and organic carbon relations described by a profile pedotransfer function for Brazilian Cerrado soils. Geoderma, 127.