Utility-based bandwidth allocation algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks

Science China Information Sciences

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 95-107

  Chai, Rong ^a   Wang, XiuJuan ^a   Chen, QianBin ^a   Svensson, Tommy ^b  

^a CHONGQING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

bandwidth allocation; bankruptcy game theory; heterogeneous wireless network; utility function

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873265178     PISSN: 1674733X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-013-4789-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chiron P, Njedjou E, Seite P, et al. Architectures for IP-based network-assisted mobility management across heterogeneous networks. IEEE Wirel Commun, 2008, 15: 18-25.
2. Cui Y, Xue Y B, Shang H Y, et al. A novel scheme and access architecture for joint radio resource management in heterogeneous networks. In: Proceedings of the International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, Guangzhou, 2009. Vol. 1: 24-27.
3. Christian M, Samuel P. An architecture for seamless mobility support in IP-based next-generation wireless networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2008, 57: 1209-1225.
4. Hamed S, Mojtaba M S, Siavash K. Cooperative joint radio resource management in wireless heterogeneous networks. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Networks and Distributed Systems, Tehran, 2011. 111-115.
5. Ibrahim M, Khawam K, Tohme S. Network centric joint radio resource policy in heterogeneous WiMAX/UMTS networks for streaming and elastic traffic. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Budapest, 2009. 1-6.
6. Tom M M. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997.
7. Kargahi M, Movaghar A. Utility accrual dynamic routing in real-time parallel systems. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst, 2010, 21: 1822-1835.
8. Esmailpour A, Nasser N. Dynamic QoS-based bandwidth allocation framework for broadband wireless networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2011, 60: 2690-2700.
9. Acharya J, Yates R D. Dynamic spectrum allocation for uplink users with heterogeneous utilities. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2009, 8: 1405-1413.
10. Weifeng S, Matyjas J D, Batalama S. Active cooperation between primary users and cognitive radio users in heterogeneous ad-hoc networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2012, 60: 1796-1805.
11. Chen Y H, Yang N Y, Chang C J, et al. A utility function-based access selection method for heterogeneous WCDMA and WLAN networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Hong Kong, 2007. 1-5.
12. Ismail M, Zhuang W H. A distributed multi-service resource allocation algorithm in heterogeneous wireless access medium. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2012, 30: 425-432.
13. Pei X B, Jiang T, Qu D M, et al. Radio resource management and access control mechanism based on a novel economic model in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2010, 59: 3047-3056.
14. Luo C Q, Ji H, Li Y. Utility-based multi-service bandwidth allocation in the 4G heterogeneous wireless access networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Budapest, 2009. 1-5.
15. Ren H l, Meng M Q. Game-theoretic modeling of joint topology control and power scheduling for wireless heterogeneous sensor networks. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng, 2009, 6: 610-625.
16. Niyato D, Hossain E. A cooperative game framework for bandwidth allocation in 4G heterogeneous wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Communications, Istanbul, 2006. Vol. 9: 4357-4362.
17. Niyato D, Hossain E. A noncooperative game-theoretic framework for radio resource management in 4G heterogeneous wireless access networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput, 2008, 7: 332-345.
18. Zhu K, Niyato D, Wang P. Optimal bandwidth allocation with dynamic service selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Miami, 2010. 1-5.
19. Al-Manthari B, Hassanein H, Ali N A, et al. Fair class-based downlink scheduling with revenue considerations in next generation revenue considerations in next generation. IEEE Trans Mob Comput, 2009, 8: 721-734.
20. Niyato D, Hossain E. Competitive pricing for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: dynamic game, inefficiency of nash equilibrium, and collusion. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2008, 26: 192-202.
21. Song G, Li Y. Utility-based resource allocation and scheduling in OFDM-based wireless broadband networks. IEEE Commun Mag, 2005, 43: 127-134.
22. Liu K H, Cai L, Shen X. Multiclass utility-based scheduling for UWB networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2008, 57: 1176-1187.
23. Pulido M, Soriano J S, Llorca N. Game theory techniques for university management: an extended bankruptcy model. Ann Oper Res, 2002, 109: 129-142.
24. Shapley L S. A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn H W, Tucker A W, eds. Annals of Mathematics Studies 28. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953. 307-317.
25. Navarro E S, Lin Y X, Vincent W S. An MDP-based vertical handoff decision algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2008, 57: 1243-1254.