Socioeconomic factors may influence the surgical technique for benign hysterectomy

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Daugbjerg, Signe B ^a,b   Ottesen, Bent ^b   Diderichsen, Finn ^c   Frederiksen, Birgitte L ^a   Osler, Merete ^a  

^a GLOSTRUP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORMONE;

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INCOME; LIFESTYLE AND RELATED PHENOMENA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METRORRHAGIA; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERUS WEIGHT; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ABDOMEN; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; LAPAROSCOPY; LIFESTYLE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; UTERUS DISEASE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; INCOME; LAPAROSCOPY; LIFE STYLE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; UTERINE DISEASES;

EID: 84873259952     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Danish National Board of Health. Referenceprogram for behandling af patienter med hysterektomi på benign indikation. Copenhagen: Danish National Board of Health, 2006.
2. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD003677.
3. Cooper R, Lucke J, Lawlor DA et al. Socioeconomic position and hysterectomy: a cross-cohort comparison of women in Australia and Great Britain. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:1057-63.
4. Dharmalingam A, Pool I, Dickson J. Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1455-8.
5. Marks NF, Shinberg DS. Socioeconomic differences in hysterectomy: the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1507-14.
6. Settnes A, Jorgensen T. Hysterectomy in a Danish cohort. Prevalence, incidence and socio-demographic characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:274-80.
7. Abenhaim HA, Azziz R, Hu J et al. Socioeconomic and racial predictors of undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for selected benign diseases: analysis of 341487 hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15: 11-5.
8. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G et al. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1041-8.
9. Hansen CT, Moller C, Daugbjerg S et al. Establishment of a national Danish hysterectomy database: preliminary report on the first 13,425 hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:546-57.
10. Glymour MM GS. Causal diagrams. In: Rothmann KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modern epidemiology. Third ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.
11. Statistic Denmark. IDA-an integrated database for labour market research. Main report; 1991. Copenhagen: Statistic Denmark, 1991.
12. Luoto R, Keskimaki I, Reunanen A. Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997;51:67-73.
13. Brett KM, Marsh JV, Madans JH. Epidemiology of hysterectomy in the United States: demographic and reproductive factors in a nationally representative sample. J Womens Health 1997;6:309-16.
14. Willems S, De MS, Deveugele M et al. Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference? Patient Educ Couns 2005;56:139-46.
15. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA et al. Indicators of socioeconomic position. In: Oaks JM, Kaufman JS, eds. Methods in social epidemiology. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2006.
16. Geyer S, Hemstrom O, Peter R et al. Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:804-10.