Optimized surgical space during low-pressure laparoscopy with deep neuromuscular blockade

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Staehr Rye, Anne K ^a   Rasmussen, Lars S ^b   Rosenberg, Jacob ^a   Juul, Poul ^c   Gätke, Mona R ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^c Aleris Hamlet Hospital   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DROPERIDOL; GENTAMICIN; IBUPROFEN; LAXATIVE; ONDANSETRON; PARACETAMOL; ROCURONIUM; SUGAMMADEX; ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE RELAXATION; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURGICAL INFECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; AERATION; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; METHODOLOGY; PRESSURE; YOUNG ADULT; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;

ADULT; ANDROSTANOLS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; INSUFFLATION; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE; NEUROMUSCULAR NONDEPOLARIZING AGENTS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PRESSURE; RESEARCH DESIGN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873259132     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2);CD006930.
2. Joshipura VP, Haribhakti SP, Patel NR et al. A prospective randomized, controlled study comparing low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009;19:234-40.
3. Abdulatif M, Taylouni E. Surgeon-controlled mivacurium administration during elective caesarean section. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:96-102.
4. Amaki Y, Haziri H, Sugimoto N et al. The degree of muscle relaxation requested by the surgens during upper abdominal surgery. J Anesth 1990;4:249-52.
5. King M, Sujirattanawimol N, Danielson DR et al. Requirements for muscle relaxants during radical retropubic preostatectomy. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1392-7.
6. Tammisto T, Olkkola KT. Dependence of the adequacy of muscle relaxation on the degree of neuromuscular block and depth of enflurane anesthesia during abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 1995;80:543-7.
7. Williams MT, Rice I, Ewen SP et al. A comparison of the effect of two anaesthetic techniques on surgical conditions during gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesthesia 2003;58:574-8.
8. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT et al. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:789-808.
9. Cantineau JP, Porte F, d'Honneur G et al. Neuromuscular effects of rocuronuim on the diaphragm and adductor pollicis muscles in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 1994;81:585-90.
10. Hemmerling TM, Donati F. Neuromuscular blockade at the larynx, the diaphragm and the corrugator supercilii muscle: a review. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:779-94.
11. Kirov K, Motamed C, Dhonneur G. Differential sensitivity of abdominal muscles and the diaphragm to mivacurium: an electromyographic study. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1323-8.
12. Dhonneur G, Kirov K, Motamed C et al. Post-tetanic count at adductor pollicis is a better indicator of early diaphragmatic recovery than train-offour count at corrugator supercilii. Br J Anaesth 2007;99:376-9.
13. www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6_R1/Step4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdf (31 Aug 2012).