Indications for knee arthroplasty have remained consistent over time

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Thomsen, Morten G ^a   Husted, Henrik ^a   Otte, Kristian S ^a   Ørsnes, Thue ^a   Troelsen, Anders ^a  

^a HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 36;

EID: 84873258629     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. The Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register and Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
2. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E et al. International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2011;35:1783-9.
3. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:780-5.
4. Günther KP, Scharf HP, Puhl W et al. Reproducibility of radiologic diagnosis in gonarthrosis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997;135:197-202.
5. Bjørner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T et al. Danish manual for SF-36. Copenhagen: LIF, 1997.
6. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 2001;45:384-91.
7. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
8. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Dept of Orthopedics, Clinical Sciences, Lund. Lund University, Sweden.
9. Hart DJ, Spector TD, Brown P et al. Clinical signs of early osteoarthritis: reproducibility and relation to x ray changes in 541 women in the general population. Ann Rheum Dis 1991;50:467-70.
10. Felson DT. The epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990;20:42-50.
11. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Faris PM et al. Does the preoperative radiographic degree of osteoarthritis correlate to results in primary total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2001;16:13-6.
12. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1722-8.
13. Shields RK, Enloe LJ, Leo KC. Health related quality of life in patients with total hip or knee replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:572-9.
14. Becker R, Döring C, Denecke A et al. Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:1433-41.
15. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA et al. Patient outcomes following unicompartmental or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a metaanalysis. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:141-50.
16. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC et al. Health related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:163-73.
17. Larsen K, Sørensen OG, Hansen TB et al. Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: a randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of followup. Acta Orthop 2008;79:149-59.
18. Lim JT, Luscombe KL, Jones PW et al. The effect of preoperative symptom severity on functional outcome of total knee replacement--patients with the lowest preoperative scores achieve the lowest marks. Knee 2006;13:216-9.
19. Kennedy LG, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE et al. When should we do knee replacements? Knee 2003;10:161-6.
20. Forsythe ME, Dunbar MJ, Hennigar AW et al. Prospective relation between catastrophizing and residual pain following knee arthroplasty: two-year follow-up. Pain Res Manag 2008;13:335-41.