Interest group-party linkage in the twenty-first century: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 264-289

  Rasmussen, Anne ^a   Lindeboom, Gert Jan ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cartel party; Civil society; Interest groups; Political parties; Political representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873244945     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: 14756765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02069.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allern, E.H. (2010). Political parties and interest groups in Norway. Colchester: ECPR Press.
2. Allern, E.H., Aylott, N. & Christiansen, F.J. (2007). Social Democrats and trade unions in Scandinavia: The decline and persistence of institutional relationships. European Journal of Political Research 46: 607-635.
3. Andeweg, R.B. & Irwin, G.A. (2009). Governance and politics in the Netherlands. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Anthonsen, M., Lindvall, J. & Schmidt-Hansen, U. (2011). Social democrats, unions and corporatism: Denmark and Sweden compared. Party Politics 17: 118-134.
5. Binderkrantz, A. (2005). Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies 53: 694-715.
6. Blom-Hansen, J. (2001). Organized Interests and the state: A disintegrating relationship? Evidence from Denmark. European Journal of Political Research 39: 391-416.
7. Coxall, B. (2001). Pressure groups in British politics. Harlow: Longman.
8. Dalton, R.J., Kuechler, M. & Bürklin, W. (1990). The challenge of new movements. In R.J. Dalton & M. Kuechler (eds), Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in Western democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. London: Methuen.
10. Fish, M.S. & Kroenig, M. (2009). The handbook of national legislatures: A global survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Golden, M.M. (1998). Interest groups in the rule-making process: Who participates? Whose voices get heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8: 245-270.
12. Gray, V. & Lowery, D. (1996). The population ecology of interest representation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
13. Hague, R. & Harrop, M. (2010). Comparative government and politics: An introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Heaney, M.T. (2010). Linking political parties and interest groups. In M.L. Sandy & J.M. Berry (eds). The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Hrebenar, R.J. (1997). Interest group politics in America. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
16. Katz, R.S. & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy. Party Politics 1: 5-28.
17. Kenworthy, L. (2003). Quantitative indicators of corporatism. International Journal of Sociology 33: 10-44.
18. Kirchheimer, O. (1966). The transformation of the Western European party systems. In J. LaPalombar & M. Weiner (eds), Political parties and political development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Kitschelt, H.P. (1989). The logics of party formation: Ecological politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20. Kitschelt, H.P. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21. Kriesi, H. (1998). The transformation of cleavage politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan lecture. European Journal of Political Research 33: 165-185.
22. Lijphart, A. & Crepaz, M.M.L. (1991). Corporatism and consensus democracy in eighteen countries: Conceptual and empirical linkages. British Journal of Political Science 21: 235-246.
23. Lipset, S.M. & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. In Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press.
24. Magat, W.A., Krupnick, A.J. & Harrington, W. (1986). Rules in the making: A statistical analysis of regulatory agency behaviour. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
25. McMenamin, I. & Schoenman, R. (2007). Together forever? Explaining exclusivity in party-firm relations. Political Studies 55: 153-173.
26. McSmith, A. (1996). Faces of Labour: The inside story. London: Verso.
27. Minkin, L. (1991). The contentious alliance: Trade unions and the Labour Party. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
28. Nixon, D.C. etal. (2002). With friends like these: Rule-making comment submissions to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12: 59-76.
29. Padgett, S. & Paterson, W. (1991). A history of social democracy in postwar Europe. London: Longman.
30. Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organizations and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Papke, L.E. & Wooldridge, J.M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11: 619-632.
32. Papke, L.E. & Wooldridge, J.M. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics 145: 121-133.
33. Pierson, P. (2000) The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance 13: 475-499.
34. Poguntke, T. (2000). Parteiorganisation im Wandel. Gesellschaftliche Verankerung und organisatorische Anpassung im europäischen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
35. Poguntke, T. (2002). Parties without firm social roots? Party organisational linkage. In K.R. Luther & F. Müller-Rommel (eds), Political parties in the new Europe: Political and analytical challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Poguntke, T. (2006). Political parties and other organizations. In R.S. Katz & W. Crotty (eds), Handbook of party politics. London: Sage.
37. Quinn, T. (2002). Block voting in the Labour Party. Party Politics 8: 207-226.
38. Quinn, T. (2010). New Labour and the trade unions in Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20: 357-380.
39. Rijksdienst (2011). Resultaten van het rijksbrede experiment internetconsultatie wetgeving. 5698502/11/6. The Hague: Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie.
40. Schattschneider, E.E. (1948). Pressure groups versus political parties. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 259: 17-23.
41. Schlozman, K.L. etal. (2008). Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus? Political Inequality and the Pressure System. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Boston, MA, 28 August.
42. Schmitter, P. (1979). Still the century of corporatism? In P. Schmitter & G. Lehbruch (eds), Trends towards corporatist intermediation. New York: Sage.
43. Schwartz, M. (2005). Linkage processes in party networks. In A. Römmele, D.M. Farrell & P. Ignazi (eds), Political parties and political systems: The concept of linkage revisited. Westport, CT: Praeger.
44. Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies. Meaning and Measurement 36: 175-205.
45. Sieberer, U. (2006). Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis. Journal of Legislative Studies 12: 150-178.
46. Silke, B. etal. (2010). An improved medical admissions risk system using multivariable fractional polynomial logistic regression modelling. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 103: 23-32.
47. Streeck, W. & Kenworthy, L. (2005). Theories and practices of neo-corporatism. In T. Janoski etal. (eds), A handbook of political sociology: States, civil societies and globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Sundberg, J. (2003). Partier och interesseorganisationer i Norden. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerraad.
49. Thomas, C.S. (ed.) (2001). Political parties and interest groups: Shaping democratic governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
50. Truman, D.B. (1951). The governmental process. New York: Knopf.
51. Visser, J. (2005). Beneath the surface of stability: New and old modes of governance in European industrial relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations 11: 287-306.
52. Von Beyme, K. (1985). Political parties in Western democracies. Aldershot: Gower.
53. Warner, C.M. (2000). Confessions of an interest group: The Catholic Church and political parties in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Witko, C. (2009). The ecology of party-organized interest relationships. Polity 41: 211-234.
55. Witter, L.A. etal. (2012). Behavioural trade-offs in response to external stimuli: Time allocation of an Arctic ungulate during varying intensities of harassment by parasitic flies. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 284-295.
56. Yackee, S.W. (2006). Sweet-talking the fourth branch: The influence of interest group comments on federal agency rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 103-124.
57. Yordanova, N. (2009). Plenary 'Amendments' to Committee Reports: Legislative Powers of the European Parliament Committees. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association.