The application of parameter sensitivity analysis methods to inverse simulation models

Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 67-90

  Murray Smith, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

inverse simulation; parameter sensitivity; sensitivity model; underwater vehicle

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK PRINCIPLE; INVERSE SIMULATION; PARAMETER PERTURBATION; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; PARAMETER SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY MODEL; UNDERWATER VEHICLES; VARIATION OF PARAMETERS;

MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84873205772     PISSN: 13873954     EISSN: 17445051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13873954.2012.696271     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Thomson, D. and Bradley, R. 2006. Inverse simulation as a tool for flight dynamics research-Principles and applications. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 42: 174-210.
2. Hess, R.A., Gao, C. and Wang, S.H. 1991. A generalized technique for inverse simulation applied to aircraft maneuvers. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn., 14(5): 920-926.
3. Fröberg, A. 2005. Extending the inverse vehicle propulsion simulation concept-to improve simulation performance, Sweden: Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköpings universitet. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Thesis No. 1181
4. Buchholz, J.J. and von Grünhagen, W. September 2004. Inversion impossible?, September, Germany: Tech. Rep., University of Applied Sciences Bremen.
5. Isidori, I. 1989. Nonlinear Control Systems: An Introduction, 2nd, Berlin: Springer.
6. Slotine, J.-J.E. and Li, W. 1991. Applied Nonlinear Control, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Hunt, L.R. and Meyer, G. 1997. Stable inversion for nonlinear systems. Automatica, 33(8): 1549-1554.
8. Zou, Q. and Devasia, S. 2007. Preview-based inversion of nonlinear nonminimum-phase systems: VTOL example. Automatica, 43(1): 117-127.
9. Lu, L., Murray-Smith, D.J. and Thomson, D.G. 2008. Issues of numerical accuracy and stability in inverse simulation. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, 16: 1350-1364.
10. Murray-Smith, D.J. 2011. Feedback methods for inverse simulation of dynamic models for engineering system applications. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst., 17(5): 515-541.
11. Tomović, R. 1963. Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Systems, New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Frank, P.M. 1978. An Introduction to System Sensitivity Theory, London: Academic Press.
13. Tomović, R. and Vukobratović, M. 1972. General Sensitivity Theory, New York: American Elsevier.
14. Kokotović, P.V. 1964. Method of sensitivity points in the investigation and optimization of linear control systems. Autom. Remote Control, 25: 1670-1676.
15. Rosenwasser, E. and Yusupov, R. 2000. Sensitivity of Automatic Control Systems, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
16. Wilkie, D.F. and Perkins, W.R. 1969. Generation of sensitivity functions for linear systems using low-order models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 14: 123-129.
17. MathWorks, Documentation, Control Systems Toolbox™. http://www.mathworks.co.uk/help/toolbox/control/ (Accessed: 4 February 2012).
18. ™. http://www.mathworks.co.uk/help/toolbox/symbolic/bqs6eo_.html (Accessed: 4 February 2012).
19. 'Reilly, J. O and Leithead, W.E. 1991. Multivariable control by 'individual channel design'. Int. J. Control, 54(1): 1-46.
20. Rosenbrock, H.H. On the design of linear multivariable control systems. Proceedings of the 3rd IFAC Congress. 1966, London. Vol. 1, London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Book 1, Paper 1A
21. Healey, A.J. and Lienard, D. 1993. Multivariable sliding-mode control for autonomous diving and steering of unmanned underwater vehicles. IEEE J. Ocean Eng., 18(3): 327-339.
22. Fossen, T.I. 1995. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, Chichester: Wiley.
23. Knudsen, M. 2006. Experimental modelling of dynamic systems: an educational approach. IEEE Trans. Edu., 49(1): 29-38.
24. M. Knudsen, Senstools. www.control.auc.dk/̃mk/public_html/ExpMod (Accessed: 7 June 2012).