Optimum culture medium composition for rhamnolipid production by pseudomonas aeruginosa AT10 using a novel multi-objective optimization method

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 271-279

  Eswari, Jujjavarapu Satya ^a,b   Anand, Mohan ^b   Venkateswarlu, Chimmiri ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY HYDERABAD   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Differential evolution; Pareto optimization; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Rhamnolipid production

Indexed keywords

BEAUTY PRODUCTS; BIO SURFACTANT; BIOSURFACTANT PRODUCTION; CARBON SOURCE; CULTURE MEDIUM; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; IRON CONTENT; MEDIUM COMPOSITION; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATIONS (MOO); NETWORK-BASED; NITROGEN SOURCES; NON-DOMINATED SORTING; OPTIMUM CULTURE MEDIUM; PARETO OPTIMIZATION; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS; RHAMNOLIPIDS; STATISTICAL REGRESSION MODEL;

BACTERIA; BIOMOLECULES; CARBON; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; LIPIDS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; NEURAL NETWORKS;

SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

BIOSURFACTANT; DIHYDROTACHYSTEROL; IRON; NITROGEN; PHOSPHATE; RHAMNOLIPID;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BATCH REACTOR; CARBON SOURCE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CULTURE MEDIUM; CULTURE OPTIMIZATION; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; LIPOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD;

PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA;

EID: 84873204378     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.3825     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cooper DG and Zajic JE, Surface active compounds from microorganisms. Adv Appl Microbiol 26: 229-253 (1980).
2. Makkar RS and Rockne KJ, Comparison of synthetic surfactants and biosurfactants in enhancing biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 22: 2280-2292 (2003).
3. Brown MJ, Biosurfactants for cosmetic applications. Int J Cosmetic Sci 13: 61-64 (1991).
4. Rodrigues L, Banat IM, Teixeira J and Oliveira R, Biosurfactants: potential applications in medicine. J Antimicrob Chemotherapy 57: 609-618 (2006).
5. Fathabad EG, Biosurfactants in pharmaceutical industry (a mini-review). Am J Drug Discovery Develop 1: 58-69 (2011).
6. Desai JD and Banat IM, Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 47-64 (1997).
7. Abalos A, Maximo F, Manresa MA and Bastida J, Utilization of response surface methodology to optimize the culture media for the production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aerogenosa AT10. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77: 777-784 (2002).
8. Chankong V and Haimes YY, Multi-objective Decision Making Theory and Methodology. Elsevier, New York (1983).
9. Ray WH, Advanced Process Control. Butterworths, New York (1989).
10. Deb K, Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2001).
11. Rajesh JK, Gupta SK, Rangaiah GP and Ray AK, Multi-objective optimization of industrial hydrogen plants. Chem Eng Sci 56: 999-1010 (2001).
12. Oh PP, Rangaiah GP and Ray AK, Simulation and multi-objective optimization of an industrial hydrogen plant based on refinery off-gas. Ind Eng Chem Res 41: 2248-2261 (2002).
13. Shachamn M and Brauner N, Considering experimental data in construction of optimal regression models. Chem Eng Process 38: 477-486 (1999).
14. Cui FJ, Li Y, Xu ZH, Xu HY, Sun K and Tao WY, Optimization of the medium composition for production of mycelial biomass and exo-polymer by Grifola frondosa GF9801 using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technol 97: 1209-1216 (2006).
15. Duta FP, de Franca FP and de Almeida Lopes LM, Optimization of culture conditions for epoxypolysaccharides production in Rhizobium sp. using the response surface method. Electron J Biotechnol 9: 391-397 (2006).
16. Anjum MF, Tasadduq I and Al-Sultan K, Response surface methodology: a neural network approach. Eur J Operations Res 101: 65-73 (1997).
17. Anand P, Siva Prasad BVN and Venkateswarlu Ch, Modeling and optimization of a pharmaceutical formulation system using radial basis function network. Int J Neural Syst 19: 127-136 (2009).
18. Nagata Y and Chu KH, Optimization of a fermentation medium using neural networks and genetic algorithms. Biotechnol Lett 25: 1837-1842 (2003).
19. Girosi F and Poggio T, Networks and the best approximation property. Biol Cybern 63: 169-179 (1990).
20. Jones WP and Hoskins J, Back propagation. BYTE Mag 155-162 (1987).
21. Narsizi G, Multi-objective optimization: a quick introduction. Webpage Notes (http://cims.nyu.edu/~gn387/glp/lec1.pdf), Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York, (2008). [Accessed on 19 Dec 2011].
22. Storn R and Price K, Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 11: 341-359 (1997).
23. Kapadi MD and Gudi RD, Optimal control of fed-batch fermentation involving multiple feeds using differential evolution. Process Biochem 39: 1709-1721 (2004).
24. Kiranmai D, Jyothirmai A and Murthy CVS, Determination of kinetic parameters in fixed-film bioreactors: an inverse approach. Biochem Eng J 23: 73-83 (2005).
25. Zhao Q, A general framework for cooperative co-evolutionary algorithms: a society model. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE Press, 57-62 (1998).
26. Roubos JA, van Straten G and van Boxtel AJB, An evolutionary strategy for fed batch bioreactor optimization: concepts and performance. J Biotechnol 67: 173-187 (1999).
27. Baughman DR and Liu YA, Neural Networks in Bioprocessing and Chemical Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1995).
28. Banerjee AK, Kiran K, Murthy USN and Venkateswarlu Ch, Classification and identification of mosquito species using ANN. Comput Biol Chem 32: 442-447 (2008).
29. Chakraborty K, Advances in Differential Evolution (Studies in Computational Intelligence v 143. Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (2008).