The mechanism underlying lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-picture interference paradigm

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 261-276

  Geng, Jingyi ^a   Kirchgessner, Megan ^a   Schnur, Tatiana ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorical interference; Competition; Lexical selection

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84873187037     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.705861     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abdel Rahman, R. and Melinger, A. 2007. When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 33: 604-614. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.604)
2. Abdel Rahman, R. and Melinger, A. 2009. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24: 713-734. (doi:10.1080/01690960802597250)
3. Alario, F.-X., Segui, J. and Ferrand, L. 2000. Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53: 741-764.
4. Aristei, S., Zwitserlood, P. and Abdel Rahman, R. 2012. Picture-induced semantic interference reflects lexical competition during object naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 3: 1-9. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00028)
5. Belke, E., Meyer, A. and Damian, M. F. 2005. Refractory effect in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 58: 667-692.
6. Bloem, I. and La Heij, W. 2003. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48: 468-488. (doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00503-X)
7. Caramazza, A. 1997. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14: 177-208. (doi:10.1080/026432997381664)
8. Costa, A., Alario, F.-X. and Caramazza, A. 2005. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12: 125-131. (doi:10.3758/BF03196357)
9. Damian, M. F. and Bowers, J. S. 2003. Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10: 111-117. (doi:10.3758/BF03196474)
10. Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G. and Levelt, W. J. M. 2001. Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81: B77-B86. (doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4)
11. Dean, M. P., Bub, D. N. and Masson, M. E. J. 2001. Interference from related items in object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27: 733-743. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.733)
12. Dell, G. 1986. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93: 283-321. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283)
13. Forster, K. I. and Forster, J. C. 2003. A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35: 116-124. (doi:10.3758/BF03195503)
14. Glaser, W. R. and Dungelhoff, F. J. 1984. The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10: 640-654. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640)
15. Glaser, W. R. and Glaser, M. O. 1989. Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118: 13-42. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.13)
16. Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J. and Fias, W. 1995. Semantic interference effects on naming using a post-cue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21: 961-980. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.961)
17. Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Maedebach, A. and Schriefers, H. 2009. Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code?. Experimental Psychology, 56: 56-65. (doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.56)
18. Kroll, J. F. and Stewart, E. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 149-174. (doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008)
19. La Heij, W., Heikoop, K. W., Akerboom, S. and Bloem, I. 2003. Picture naming in picture context: Semantic interference or semantic facilitation?. Psychology Science, 45: 49-62.
20. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W. and Laham, D. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analyses. Discourse Processes, 25: 259-284. Retrieved from http://lsa.colorado.edu (doi:10.1080/01638539809545028)
21. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1-75.
22. Luce, P. A. 1986. Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. and Caramazza, A. 2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 33: 503-535. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503)
24. Meyer, A. S. and Damian, M. F. 2007. Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35: 494-503. (doi:10.3758/BF03193289)
25. Morsella, E. and Miozzo, M. 2002. Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 28: 555-563. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.555)
26. Navarrete, E. and Costa, A. 2005. Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 53: 359-377. (doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.001)
27. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L. and Schreiber, T. A. 2004. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36: 402-407. (doi:10.3758/BF03195588)
28. Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S. and Schwartz, M. F. 2010. The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114: 227-252. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007)
29. Roelofs, A. 1992. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42: 107-142. (doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F)
30. Roelofs, A. 2003. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110: 88-125. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.88)
31. Roelofs, A. 2008. Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 34: 353-368. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.353)
32. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S. and Levelt, W. J. M. 1990. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29: 86-102. (doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N)
33. Snodgrass, J. G. and Vanderwart, M. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6: 174-215. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174)
34. Starreveld, P. A. and La Heij, W. 1995. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21: 686-698. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686)