Evaluating mental workload of two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization for anatomical structure localization

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 65-70

  Foo, Jung Leng ^a   Martinez Escobar, Marisol ^a   Juhnke, Bethany ^a   Cassidy, Keely ^b   Hisley, Kenneth ^c   Lobe, Thom ^d   Winer, Eliot ^a  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b DES MOINES UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TOURO UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Blank Children's Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CELIAC ARTERY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GALLBLADDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL WORKLOAD; NASA TASK LOAD INDEX; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANATOMY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MENTAL PROCESSES; SOFTWARE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84873162826     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0150     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Vital Images. www.vitalimages.com/solutions/Vitrea- Enterprise-Suite.aspx (accessed March 4, 2011
2. Amira. www.amira.com (accessed March 4, 2011
3. OsiriX imaging software. www.osirix-viewer.com (accessed March 4, 2011
4. St. John M, et al. The use of 2D and 3D displays for shapeunderstanding versus relative-position tasks. Hum Factors 2001;43:79-98.
5. Nekolny B, Holub J, Foo JL, Winer E. Evaluation of endoscopic surgical planning in an interactive 3D visualization environment. Presented at the International Pediatric Surgery Group 19th Annual Congress for Endosurgery in Children, Emerging Technologies Session, Waikoloa, HI, June 8-12, 2010.
6. Byrne AJ, Oliver M, Bodger O, Barnett WA, Williams D, Jones H, Murphy A. Novel method of measuring the mental workload of anaesthetists during clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:767-771.
7. Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB. Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 2005;12:80-90.
8. Hart SG. Nasa-Task Load Index (Nasa-TLX): 20 years later. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc 2006;50:904-908.
9. Klein MI, Lio CH, Grant R, Carswell CM, Strup S. A mental workload study on the 2d and 3d viewing conditions of the da Vinci surgical robot. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc 2009; 53:1186-1190.
10. Lio CH, Bailey K, Carswell CM, Seales WB, Clarke D, Payton GM. Time estimation as a measure of mental workload during the training of laparoscopic skills. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc 2006;50:1910-1913.
11. O'Connor A, Schwaitzberg SD, Cao CGL. How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture? Surg Endosc 2008; 22:1614-1619.
12. Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, Matthews G, Donovan JF, Doarn C. Performance, stress, workload, and coping profiles in 1st-year medical students' interaction with the endoscopic/ laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical techniques. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc 2008;52:885-889.
13. Boles DB, Bursk JH, Philips JB, Perdelwitz Jr. Predicting dual-task performance with the Multiple Resource Questionnaire (MRQ). Hum Factors 2007;49:32-45.