Some new insights in derivative-based global sensitivity measures

11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 1094-1104

  Iooss, Bertrand ^a   Popelin, Anne Laure ^a   Blatman, Géraud ^a   Ciric, Catalina ^a   Gamboa, Fabrice ^b   Lacaze, Sylvain ^a   Lamboni, Matieyendou ^b  

^a EDF R AND D   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE MATHÉMATIQUES DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Computer experiment; Derivative based global sensitivity measure; Sensitivity analysis; Sobol' indices; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BOLTZMANN; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; FAST METHODS; FIRST-ORDER; GENERIC STRATEGIES; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY; IMPORTANCE MEASURE; INPUT VARIABLES; MODEL EVALUATION; MODEL OUTPUTS; NUMERICAL TESTS; PREY-PREDATOR; PROBABILITY MEASURES; SENSITIVITY INDICES; SOBOL' INDICES; UNCERTAINTY;

SAFETY ENGINEERING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

NUMERICAL MODELS;

EID: 84873162263     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. Global Sensitivity Analysis: the Primer. Wiley, New York, 2008.
2. I. M. Sobol and S. Kucherenko. Derivative based global sensitivity measures and the link with global sensitivity indices. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79:3009-3017, 2009.
3. S. Kucherenko, M. Rodriguez-Fernandez, C. Pantelides, and N. Shah. Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94:1135- 1148, 2009.
4. M. Lamboni, B. Iooss, A-L. Popelin, and F. Gamboa. Derivative-based global sensitivity mea- sures: general links with sobol' indices and numerical tests. 2012, submitted. Available at URL: http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/1202.0943.
5. I.M. Sobol. Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models. Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiments, 1:407-414, 1993.
6. A. Saltelli. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145:280-297, 2002.
7. S. Da Veiga, F. Wahl, and F. Gamboa. Local polynomial estimation for sensitivity analysis on models with correlated inputs. Technometrics, 51(4):452-463, 2009.
8. K-T. Fang, R. Li, and A. Sudjianto. Design and modeling for computer experiments. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006.
9. M.D. Morris. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33:161-174, 1991.
10. I.M. Sobol and S. Kucherenko. A new derivative based importance criterion for groups of variables and its link with the global sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 181(7):1212 -1217, 2010.
11. P. Fougeres. Spectral gap for log-concave probability measures on the real line. In Seminaire de Probabilites XXXVIII, volume 1857 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 95-123. Springer, 2005.
12. C. Ciric, P Ciffroy, and S. Charles. Use of sensitivity analysis to discriminate non-inuential and inuential parameters within an aquatic ecosystem model. submitted.
13. F. Campolongo and R. Braddock. The use of graph theory in the sensitivity analysis of the model output: a second order screening method. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 64:1-12, 1999.