Nonlinear coupling between occipital and motor cortex during motor imagery: A dynamic causal modeling study

NeuroImage

Volumn 71, Issue , 2013, Pages 104-113

  Van Wijk, B C M ^a   Litvak, V ^b   Friston, K J ^b   Daffertshofer, A ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cross frequency coupling; Dynamic causal modeling; Effective connectivity; Induced responses; MEG; Motor imagery

Indexed keywords

ALPHA RHYTHM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CAUSAL MODELING; FREQUENCY MODULATION; GAMMA RHYTHM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROIMAGING; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL STUDY; VISUAL CORTEX;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84873144700     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.076     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bastos A., Usrey W.M., Adams R.A., Mangun G.R., Fries P., Friston K.J. Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron 2012, 76:695-711.
2. Bruns A., Eckhorn R. Task-related coupling from high- to low-frequency signals among visual cortical areas in human subdural recordings. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2004, 51:97-116.
3. Buffalo E.A., Fries P., Landman R., Buschman T.J., Desimone R. Laminar differences in gamma and alpha coherence in the ventral stream. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:11262-11267.
4. Canolty R.T., Knight R.T. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:506-515.
5. Chen C.C., Kiebel S.J., Friston K.J. Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses. Neuroimage 2008, 41:1293-1312.
6. Chen C.C., Henson R.N., Stephan K.E., Kilner J.M., Friston K.J. Forward and backward connections in the brain: a DCM study of functional asymmetries. Neuroimage 2009, 45:453-462.
7. Chen C.C., Kilner J.M., Friston K.J., Kiebel S.J., Jolly R.K., Ward N.S. Nonlinear coupling in the human motor system. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:8393-8399.
8. David O., Kiebel S.J., Harrison L.M., Mattout J., Kilner J.M., Friston K.J. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1255-1272.
9. de Lange F.P., Hagoort P., Toni I. Neural topography and content of movement representations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:97-112.
10. de Lange F.P., Jensen O., Bauer M., Toni I. Interactions between posterior gamma and frontal alpha/beta oscillations during imagined actions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2008, 2:7.
11. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:293-301.
12. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:127-138.
13. Friston K.J., Harrison L., Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1273-1302.
14. Friston K., Kilner J., Harrison L. A free energy principle for the brain. J. Physiol. (Paris) 2006, 100:70-87.
15. Friston K.J., Bastos A., Litvak V., Stephan K.E., Fries P., Moran R.J. DCM for complex-valued data: cross-spectra, coherence and phase-delays. Neuroimage 2012, 59:439-455.
16. Hillebrand A., Barnes G.R. Beamformer analysis of MEG data. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2005, 68:149-171.
17. Jansen B.H., Rit V.G. Electroencephalogram and visual-evoked potential generation in a mathematical-model of coupled cortical columns. Biol. Cybern. 1995, 73:357-366.
18. Jensen O., Colgin L.L. Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:267-269.
19. Kiebel S.J., Daunizeau J., Friston K.J. A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4:e1000209.
20. Litvak V., Mattout J., Kiebel S., Phillips C., Henson R., Kilner J., Barnes G., Oostenveld R., Daunizeau J., Flandin G., Penny W., Friston K. EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011:852961.
21. Moran R.J., Stephan K.E., Seidenbecher T., Pape H.C., Dolan R.J., Friston K.J. Dynamic causal models of steady-state responses. Neuroimage 2009, 44:796-811.
22. Mumford D. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. 2. The role of corticocortical loops. Biol. Cybern. 1992, 66:241-251.
23. Nolte G., Ziehe A., Nikulin V.V., Schlogl A., Kramer N., Brismar T., Muller K.R. Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100:234101.
24. Penny W.D., Litvak V., Fuentemilla L., Duzel E., Friston K. Dynamic causal models for phase coupling. J. Neurosci. Methods 2009, 183:19-30.
25. Rao R.P.N., Ballard D.H. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:79-87.
26. Roopun A.K., Lebeau F.E.N., Rammell J., Cunningham M.O., Traub R.D., Whittington M.A. Cholinergic neuromodulation controls directed temporal communication in neocortex in vitro. Front. Neural Circuits 2010, 4:8.
27. Spaak E., Bonnefond M., Maier A., Leopold D.A., Jensen O. Layer-specific entrainment of gamma-band neural activity by the alpha rhythm in monkey visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:16.
28. Tass P., Rosenblum M.G., Weule J., Kurths J., Pikovsky A., Volkmann J., Schnitzler A., Freund H.J. Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data: application to magnetoencephalography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81:3291-3294.