Oncological outcomes: Open vs robotic prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 206-212

  Silberstein, Jonathan L ^a   Su, Daniel ^a   Glickman, Leonard ^a   Kent, Matthew ^a   Keren Paz, Gal ^a   Vickers, Andrew J ^a   Coleman, Jonathan A ^a,b   Eastham, James A ^a,b   Scardino, Peter T ^a,b   Laudone, Vincent P ^a,b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

minimally invasive surgery; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasm; robotic

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING CURVE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOMOGRAM; OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; BLOOD; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR RECURRENCE; UROLOGY; UTILIZATION REVIEW; WORKLOAD;

AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HOSPITALS, HIGH-VOLUME; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLOGY; WORKLOAD;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873139079     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11638.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol 2012; 187: 2087-2093
2. Walsh PC,. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998; 160: 2418-2424
3. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J,. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003; 169: 2289-2292
4. Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, et al. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 170: 1798-1803
5. Touijer K, Rabbani F, Otero JR, et al. Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%. J Urol 2007; 178: 120-124
6. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 715-717
7. Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010; 8: 162-200
8. Binder J, Kramer W,. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001; 87: 408-410
9. Silberstein JL, Vickers AJ, Power NE, et al. Reverse stage shift at a tertiary care center: escalating risk in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2011; 117: 4855-4860
10. Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol 2010; 183: 990-996
11. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103: 448-453
12. Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A,. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2010; 59: 1-6
13. Vickers A, Bianco F, Cronin A, et al. The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point. J Urol 2010; 183: 1360-1365
14. Klein EA, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories. J Urol 2008; 179: 2212-2216; discussion 6-7
15. Godoy G, Chong KT, Cronin A, et al. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph node involvement. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 195-201
16. Silberstein JL, Vickers AJ, Power NE, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with elevated risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy: comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures. J Endourol 2012; 26: 748-753
17. Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 702-707
18. Feifer AH, Elkin EB, Lowrance WT, et al. Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2011; 117: 3933-3942
19. David P, Wood J,. Management of the intermediate risk patient. 2010. 11th Annual Meeting of the Society of Urologic Oncology 2010, Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Natcher Conference Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. Available at: http://www.urotoday.com/UroToday/Archives/suo-2010-surgical-approaches-and- outcomes-for-the-intermediate-risk-patient-session-highlights-2233610.html. Accessed December 2012
20. Yossepowitch O, Eggener SE, Bianco FJ Jr, et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods. J Urol 2007; 178: 493-499
21. Zelefsky MJ, Eastham JA, Cronin AM, et al. Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1508-1513
22. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR,. Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1117-1123
23. Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, et al. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010; 183: 977-982
24. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC,. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999; 281: 1591-1597