An efficient framework for optimization and parameter sensitivity analysis in arterial growth and remodeling computations

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 256, Issue , 2013, Pages 200-210

  Sankaran, Sethuraman ^a   Humphrey, Jay D ^b   Marsden, Alison L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

Derivative free methods; Growth and remodeling; Parameter sensitivity; Stochastic collocation

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; ARTERIAL GROWTH; ARTERIAL WALL; BRUTE-FORCE APPROACH; COLLOCATION APPROACHES; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DERIVATIVE-FREE METHODS; DERIVATIVE-FREE OPTIMIZATION; DISEASE PROCESS; LOADING CONDITION; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MEAN VALUES; MECHANICAL LOADING; MODEL PARAMETERS; MONTE CARLO; NON-INTRUSIVE; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL PARAMETER SELECTION; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; REALISTIC VARIABILITY; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; SAMPLING ALGORITHM; SPARSE GRID; STOCHASTIC COLLOCATION; SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS; WALL SHEAR STRESS;

ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

LOADING;

EID: 84873139028     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Humphrey J.D. Vascular adaptation and mechanical homeostasis at tissue, cellular and sub-cellular levels. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 50:53-78.
2. Figueroa C.A., Baek S., Taylor C.A., Humphrey J.D. A computational framework for fluid-solid-growth modeling in cardiovascular simulations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2008, 198:3583-3602.
3. Humphrey J.D., Rajagopal K. A constrained mixture model for growth and remodeling of soft tissues. Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2002, 12(3):407-430.
4. Kuhn E., Maas R., Himpel G., Menzel A. Computational modeling of arterial wall growth. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2007, 6:321-331.
5. Taber L.A. A model for aortic growth based on fluid shear and fiber stresses. J. Biomech. Eng. 1998, 120:348-354.
6. Tozeren A., Skalak R. Interaction of stress and growth in a fibrous tissue. J. Theor. Biol. 1988, 130(3):337-350.
7. Rachev A. A model of arterial adaptation to alterations in blood flow. J. Elasticity 2000, 61(1-3):83-111.
8. Rodriguez E.K., Hoger A., McCulloch A.D. Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. J. Biomech. 1994, 27(4):455-467.
9. Watton P.N., Hill N.A., Heil M. A mathematical model for the growth of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2004, 3:98-113.
10. Kroon M., Holzapfel G.A. A model for saccular cerebral aneurysm growth by collagen fiber remodeling. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 247:775-787.
11. Valentin A., Humphrey J.D. Evaluation of fundamental hypotheses underlying constrained mixture models of arterial growth and remodeling. Phil. Trans. R.Soc. A 2009, 367:3585-3606.
12. Valentin A., Cardamone L., Baek S., Humphrey J.D. Complementary vasoactivity and matrix remodeling in arterial adaptations to altered flow and pressure. J. R. Soc. Interface 2009, 6(32):293-306.
13. Valentin A., Humphrey J.D. Parameter sensitivity study of a constrained mixture model of arterial growth and remodeling. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131:101006-1-101006-11.
14. Sankaran S. Stochastic optimization using a sparse-grid collocation scheme. Probabilist. Eng. Mech. 2009, 24(3):382-396.
15. Sankaran S., Marsden A.L. A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations. J. Biomech. Eng. 2011, 133:031001. 1.
16. Xiu D., Hesthaven J.S. High order collocation methods for the differential equation with random inputs. J. Sci. Comput. 2005, 27:1118-1139.
17. Audet C., Dennis J.E. Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 2006, 17(1):2-11.
18. Marsden A.L., Feinstein J.A., Taylor C.A. A computational framework for derivative-free optimization of cardiovascular geometries. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2008, 197(21-24):1890-1905.
19. Yang W., Feinstein J.A., Marsden A. Constrained optimization of an idealized y-shaped baffle for the Fontan surgery at rest and exercise. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2010, 199(33-36):2135-2149.
20. Sankaran S., Marsden A.L. The impact of uncertainty on shape optimization of idealized bypass graft models in unsteady flow. Phys. Fluids 2010, 22:121902.
21. Sankaran S., Audet C., Marsden A.L. A method for stochastic constrained optimization using derivative-free surrogate pattern search and collocation. J. Comput. Phys. 2010, 229(12):4664-4682.
22. Xiu D., Karniadakis G.E. Modeling uncertainty in steady state diffusion problems via generalized polynomial chaos. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2002, 191:4927-4948.
23. I. Babuska, F. Nobile, and R. Tempone, A stochastic collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations with random input data, ICES report, pp. 05-47, 2005.
24. Metropolis N., Ulam S. The Monte-Carlo method. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1949, 44(247):335-341.
25. Najm H.N. Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2009, 41:35-52.
26. Gerstner T., Griebel M. Numerical integration using sparse grids. Numer. Algorithms 1998, 18(3):209-232.
27. Eldred M.S., Webster C.G., Constantine P.G. Design under uncertainty employing stochastic expansion methods. Am. J. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 2008, 2008-6001:1-22.
28. A. Klimke, Uncertainty modeling using fuzzy arithmetic and sparse grids, PhD Thesis, Universitt Stuttgart, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2006.
29. Eldred M.S. Recent advances in non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty analysis and design. AIAA 2009, 2009-2274:1-37.
30. Marsden A.L., Wang M., Dennis J.E., Moin P. Optimal aeroacoustic shape design using the surrogate management framework. Optim. Eng. 2004, 5(2):235-262.
31. Booker A.J., Dennis J.E., Frank P.D., Serafini D.B., Torczon V., Trosset M.W. A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct. Optim. 1999, 17(1):1-13.
32. Queipo N.V., Haftka R.T., Shyy W., Goel T., Vaidyanathan R., Kevin Tucker P. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2005, 41(1):1-28.
33. http://www.imm.dtu.dk/hbni/dace/.
34. M.A. Abramson, C. Audet, G. Couture, J.E. Dennis Jr., S. Le Digabel, and C. Tribes, The NOMAD project.
35. Audet C., Dennis J.E. A progressive barrier approach to derivative-free nonlinear programming. SIAM J. Optim. 2009, 20(1):445-472.
36. Wagner H.P., Humphrey J.D. Differential passive and active biaxial mechanical behaviors of muscular and elastic arteries: basilar versus common carotid. J. Biomech. Eng. 2011, 133:051009-01-051009-10.
37. Constantine P.G., Eldred M.S., Phipps E.T. Sparse pseudospectral approximation method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2012, 229(232):1-12.