Critical comparison of two user friendly tools to study piecewise deterministic markov processes (PDMP)

11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 816-825

  Bouissou, M ^a,b   Jankovic, Marija ^b  

^a EDF R AND D   (France)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

KB3; PDMP; System dynamics; Vensim

Indexed keywords

CELL-TO-CELL MAPPING; CONTINUOUS STATE; CPU TIME; DEPENDABILITY ANALYSIS; DETERMINISTIC MODELS; DISCRETE VARIABLES; DYNAMIC RELIABILITY; KB3; MODELING POWER; OTHER DISCRETE; PDMP; PIECEWISE DETERMINISTIC MARKOV PROCESS; RANDOM MODEL; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; TANK SYSTEM; TEST CASE; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; USER-FRIENDLY TOOL; VALIDATION PROCESS; VENSIM;

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; HYBRID SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SYSTEM THEORY;

RELIABILITY;

EID: 84873132812     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Davis M.H.A. Markov Models and Optimization. Chapman& Hall, 1993.
2. Bouissou M. Automated Dependability Analysis of Complex Systems with the KB3 Workbench: the Experience of EDF R&D. Proceedings of The International Conference on Energy and Environment, CIEM 2005, Bucharest (Romania), 2005.
3. KB3-BDMP tool. http://rdsoft.edf.fr (French and English versions can be downloaded).
4. Forrester J. W. Industrial dynamics. Waltham, MA, Pegasus Communications, 1961.
5. Sterman J. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2000.
6. Homer J. and Hirsch G. System Dynamics Modeling for Public Health: Background and Opportunities. American Journal of Public Health 96(3) 2006.
7. Eymard R. and Mercier S. Comparison of numerical methods for the assessment of production availability of a hybrid system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, available online 29 December 2006, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.001.
8. Cocozza-Thivent C., Eymard R., Mercier S. A finite volume scheme for dynamic reliability models. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Advance Access published on 6 March 2006, 26(3), pp. 446-471, doi:10.1093/imanum/drl001.
9. Bouissou M. Comparison of two Monte Carlo schemes for simulating Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes. Proceedings of MMR 2007.
10. Aldemir T. Utilization of the Cell-to-Cell Mapping Technique to Construct Markov Failure Models for Process Control Systems, PSAM Proceedings, Elsevier Publishing Company Co. Inc., NY, pp 1431-1436, 1991.
11. Lair W., Mercier S., Roussignol M., Ziani R. Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes and maintenance modelling : application to maintenance of a train air conditioning system. Proceedings of the institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 225(2), pp. 199-209, 2011.
12. Lair W., Mercier S., Roussignol M., Ziani R. Processus markoviens déterministes par morceaux et quantification avec un schéma de volumes finis : un cas d'étude. Proceedings of Lambda-Mu 17, 2010.
13. Zhang H., Dufour F., Dutuit Y., Gonzalez K. Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes and dynamic reliability. Proceedings of the institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 222(4), pp. 545-551, 2008.
14. Broy P., Donat R., Chraibi H. Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks to solve a dynamic reliability problem. Proceedings of ESREL 2011, Troyes, 2011.
15. Hakobyan A., Aldemir T., Denning R., Dunagan S., Kunsman D., Rutt B., Catalyurek U. Dynamic generation of accident progression event trees, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Volume 238, Issue 12, pp. 3457-3467, 2008.