Haven't a cue? Mapping the CUE space as an aid to HRA modeling

11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 3662-3672

  Gertman, David I ^a   Boring, Ronald L ^a   Hugo, Jacques ^a   Phoenix, William ^a  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced HSI; CUE map; HRA; Nuclear power plant control rooms; Operator performance; Situation awareness

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED HSI; ANALYSIS PROCESS; AUTOMATION FAILURES; COGNITIVE MAPS; FAULT-TREES; HRA; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; HYBRID PLANTS; MODELING APPROACH; MODELING ENVIRONMENTS; OPERATOR PERFORMANCE; OPERATOR RESPONSE; PRESENTATION SYSTEM; ROOM ENVIRONMENT; SITUATION AWARENESS; SMALL MODULAR REACTORS; STANDARD PERFORMANCE; STATIC SYSTEMS; SYSTEM DEPENDENCIES; SYSTEM STATUS; TEMPORAL INFORMATION;

AUTOMATION; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

DESIGN;

EID: 84873125537     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E. & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device, Psychological Review, 105, (1): 158-173.
2. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Fiore, S. M. & Salas, E. (2004). Why we need team cognition, University of Central Florida Technical Report, Orlando, Florida. Also, parts appear in E. Salas and S. Fiore (Eds) Team Cognition, Understanding the factors that drive process and performance 234-258.
4. Gardner, H. E. (1987) the Minds New Science, A History of the Cognitive Revolution, Basic Books.
5. Smith, M., Salvendy, G., Harris, D. and Koubek R. (Eds), (2001). Usability evaluation and interface design: cognitive engineering, intelligent agents and virtual reality, Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ.
6. Gertman, D. I., Blackman, Byers, Marble, J. and Smith, C. (2005). The Spar-H Human reliability Analysis Method, NUREG/CR-6883, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005.
7. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs 74: 1-29.
8. Stout, R., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1996). The role of shared mental models in developing team situation awareness: Implications or training. Training Research Journal, 2, 85-116.
9. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159-177.
10. US NRC Technical Training Manual for Reactor Concepts for Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Systems, US NRC Technical training Center, Chattanooga TN 0603. Chapter 4-1 to 4-27.
11. Novack, J. D. and Canas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them, Technical Report, IHMC CmapTools, 2006-01 Rev 2008-01.
12. Kiekel, P. & Cooke, N. J., (2004). Human Factors Aspects of Team Cognition, The Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2004). Chapter 6.
13. Stout, Renee J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. and Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41: 61.
14. Yee, S., Nguyen, L., Green, P.A., Oberholtzer, J., Miller, B., (2007). Visual, auditory, cognitive, and psychomotor demands of real in-vehicle tasks (Technical report UMTRI- 2006-20). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.