Simulation and performance evaluation of GSM propagation channel under the urban, suburban and rural environments

Proceedings - 2012 International Conference on Communication, Information and Computing Technology, ICCICT 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Nimavat, Vishal D ^a   Kulkarni, G R ^b  

^a Shinghaniya University   (India)

^b CC Engg and Technology   (India)

Author keywords

Cost 231 Model; Cost 231 W I Model; Ericsson Mode; FSPL; Okumura Model; SUI Model

Indexed keywords

900 MHZ; CELL PLANNING; CELLULAR FREQUENCIES; COMPARE AND ANALYZE; ERICSSON; FSPL; GSM NETWORKS; HATA MODEL; LINE-OF-SIGHT; NLOS CONDITIONS; NONLINE OF SIGHT; PATH LOSS; PATH LOSS MODELS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PROPAGATION CHANNELS; PROPAGATION LOSS; RECEIVER ANTENNAS; RURAL ENVIRONMENT;

COMMUNICATION; GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS;

COSTS;

EID: 84873100700     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCICT.2012.6398137     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Ibrahim Khider Eltahir "The Impact of Different Radio Propagation Models for Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) in Urban Area Environment," The 2nd International Conference on Wireless Broadband and Ultra Wideband Communications (Aus Wireless 2007).
2. Y. Okumura, "Field strength variability in VHF and UHF land mobile services," Rev. Elec. Comm. Lab. Vol. 16, pp. 825-873, Sept-Oct 1968.
3. nd edition, New Delhi, Prentice Hall, pp. 151-152, 2005.
4. S. R. Saundrs M. Hata, "Empirical Formula for Propagation Loss in Land Mobile Radio Services,", IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technolog Conference Proceedings, Vol. VT 29, August 1980.
5. A. Medeisis and A. Kajackas, "On the use of the Use of the Universal Okumura-Hata Propagation Predication Model in Rural Areas," Vehicular Technolog Conference Proceedings, VTC Tokyo, Vol. 3, pp. 1815-1818, May 2000.
6. R. D. Wilson and R. A. Scholtz, Comparison of CDMA and Modulation Schemes for UWB Radio in a Multipath Environment, Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 754-758, Dec 2003.
7. V.S. Abhayawardhana, I.J. Wassel, D. Crosby, M.P. Sellers, M.G. Brown, "Comparison of empirical propagation path loss models for fixed wireless access systems," 61th IEEE Technology Conference, Stockholm, pp. 73-77, 2005. (Pubitemid 41424104)
8. Josip Milanovic, Rimac-Drlje S, Bejuk K., "Comparison of propagation model accuracy for WiMAX on 3.5GHz," 14th IEEE International conference on electronic circuits and systems, Morocco, pp. 111-114. 2007.
9. V. Erceg, K.V. S. Hari, M.S. Smith, D.S. Baum, K.P. Sheikh, C. Tappenden, J. M. Costa, C. Bushue, A. Sarajedini R. Schwartz, D. Branlund, T. Kaitz, D. Trinkwon, "Channel Models for Fixed Wireless Applications," IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group, 2001.
10. S. Paiboon, P. Phokharatkul, S. Somkuarpanit, "Propagation-Path Losses Characterization for 800 MHz Cellular Communications in Bangkok,", IEEE, pp. 1209-1211, 1999.