Risk communication in South Korea: Social acceptance of nuclear power plants (NPPs)

Public Relations Review

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 55-56

  Song, Yosep ^a   Kim, Daewook ^b   Han, Dongsub ^c  

^a Korea Creative Content Agency   (South Korea)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Communication quality; Perceived efficacy; Perceived risk; Risk communication in Korea; Social acceptance of nuclear power plants; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873057829     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Chung J.B., Kim H.-K., Rho S.K. Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:1021-1032.
2. Palenchar M.J., Heath R.L. Another part of the risk communication model: Analysis of communication processes and message content. Journal of Public Relations Research 2002, 14:127-158.
3. Sjöberg L., Drottz-Sjöberg B.M. Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository. Journal of Risk Research 2001, 4:75-102.
4. Sjöberg L., Drottz-Sjöberg B.M. Attitudes towards nuclear waste and siting policy: Experts and the public. Nuclear Waste Research: Siting, Technology and Treatment 2008, 47-74.
5. Taylor-Goody P., Zinn J.O. Current directions in risk research: New developments in psychology and sociology. Risk Analysis 2006, 26:397-411.