Human acellular dermis versus submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction: A multivariate analysis of short-term complications

Archives of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 19-27

  Davila, Armando A ^a   Seth, Akhil K ^a   Wang, Edward ^b,c   Hanwright, Philip ^a   Bilimoria, Karl ^b   Fine, Neil ^a   Kim, John Y S ^a  

^a Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery   (United States)

^b Department of Surgery ^*  (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alloderm; Breast implantation; Complications; Mammaplasty; Tissue expansion devices

Indexed keywords

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 84873051389     PISSN: 22346163     EISSN: 22346171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.1.19     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 1995;21:243-8.
2. Kim JY, Bullocks JM, Basu CB, et al. Dermal composite flaps reconstructed from acellular dermis: a novel method of neo-urethral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:96e-100e.
3. Buinewicz B, Rosen B. Acellular cadaveric dermis (Allo-Derm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:188-94.
4. Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1743-53.
5. Buck DW 2nd, Heyer K, DiBardino D, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction with the use of crescentric tissue expansion: a functional cosmetic analysis of 40 con-secutive patients. Aesthet Surg J 2010;30:194-200.
6. Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, et al. An 8-year expe-rience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Re-constr Surg 2011;127:514-24.
7. Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:250-5.
8. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:418-25.
9. Losken A. Early results using sterilized acellular human der-mis (NeoForm) in post-mastectomy tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1654-8.
10. Rawlani V, Buck DW 2nd, Johnson SA, et al. Tissue expand-er breast reconstruction using prehydrated human acellular dermis. Ann Plast Surg 2011;66:593-7.
11. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of out-comes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1735-40.
12. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1606-14.
13. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125: 429-36.
14. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:674-8.
15. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, et al. Postoperative complica-tions in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acel-lular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1755-62.
16. Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast re-construction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:28-41.
17. Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of ef-ficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128:1162-9.
18. ACS NSQIP data: participant use data file. American Col-lege of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [Internet]. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; c2002-2012 [cited 2012 Feb 15]. Available from: http://acsnsqip.org/puf/PufRequestHomepage.aspx.
19. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, out-come-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1998;228:491-507.
20. User guide for the 2010 participant use data file. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improve-ment Program [Internet]. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; [cited 2012 Jun 21]. Available from: http://site.acsnsqip.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2010-User-Guide_FINAL.pdf.
21. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:710-8.
22. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting com-plications following expander/implant breast reconstruc-tion: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1886-92.
23. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2265-74.
24. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast re-construction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:395-408.
25. Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Dumanian GA, et al. Outcomes of tis-sue expander/implant breast reconstruction in the setting of prereconstruction radiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129: 354-61.