The key breeding sites by pupal survey for dengue mosquito vectors, Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse), in Guba, Cebu City, Philippines

Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1365-1374

  Edillo, Frances E ^a   Roble, Noel D ^a   Otero II, Nenito D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Aedes aegypti; Aedes albopictus; Dengue mosquitoes; Productive breeding sites; Pupal survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873036165     PISSN: 01251562     EISSN: 26975718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arrendondo-Jimenez JI, Valdez-Delgado KM. Aedes aegypti pupal/demographic surveys in southern Mexico: consistency and practicality. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2006;100(suppl 1):S17-32.
2. Bangs MJ, Pudiantari R, Gionar YR. Persistence of dengue virus RNA in dried Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) exposed to natural tropical conditions. J Med Entomol 2007;44:163-7.
3. Barrera R, Amador M, Clark GG. Use of the pupal survey technique for measuring Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) productivity in Puerto Rico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006;74:290-302.
4. Basio RG. The mosquito fauna of the Philippines (Diptera: Culicidae). Monographs of the National Museum of the Philippines. Manila: National Museum, 1971;4:1-198.
5. Belkin JN. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera: Culicidae). 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.
6. Bisset JA, Marquetti MC, Suarez S, Rodriguez MM, Padmanabha H. Application of the pupal/demographic-survey methodology in an area of Havana, Cuba, with low densities of Aedes aegypti (L.). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2006;100(suppl 1):S45-51.
7. Chen CD, Seleena B, Naznur WA, et al. Dengue vectors surveillance in endemic areas in Kuala Lumpur City Center and Selangor State, Malaysia. Dengue Bull 2006;30:197-203.
8. De Freitas M, De Oliveira LR. Does targeting key-containers effectively reduce Aedes aegypti population density? Trop Med Int Health 2011;16:965-73.
9. Department of Health Regional Epidemiological and Surveillance Unit Region 7 (DOH-RESU 7) Office. Dengue surveillance report 2010. Cebu City: DOH-RESU 7, 2010.
10. Department of Health, Republic of the Philippines. Manila: DOH, 2011. [Cited 2011 May 15]. Available from: URL: http://www.doh. Kov. ph/programs/denKue.html
11. Edillo FE, Largo G Jr, Plateros CG. Screening for Aedes mosquito larvicidal activity of two local plant extracts. Philipp Scientist 1996;33:104-15.
12. Edillo FE, Plateros CG, De Los Santos I. A survey of Aedes mosquitoes in Cebu City North District (Diptera: Culicidae). Philipp Scientist 1995;32:46-65.
13. th Annual Meeting, 2009. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2009;81:232.
14. Focks DA. A Review of entomological sampling methods and indicators for dengue vectors. Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. Geneva: UNICEF, UNDP, World Bank, World Health Organization, 2003.
15. Focks DA, Chadee DD. Pupal survey: an epidemiologically significant surveillance method for Aedes aegypti: an example using data from Trinidad. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1997;56:159-67.
16. Lenhart AE, Castillo CE, Oviedo M, Villegas E. Use of the pupal/demographic survey technique to identify the epidemiologically important types of containers producing Aedes aegypti (L.) in a dengue-endemic area of Venezuela. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2006;100(suppl 1):S53-9.
17. Mahilum MM, Ludwig M, Madon MB, Becker N. Evaluation of the present dengue situation and control strategies against Aedes aegypti in Cebu City, Philippines. J Vector Ecol 2005;2:277-83.
18. Midega JT, Nzovu J, Kahindi S, Sang RC, Mbogo C. Application of the pupal/demographicsurvey methodology to identify the key container habitats of Aedes aegypti (L.) in Malindi district, Kenya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2006; (suppl 1): S61-72.
19. Napallacan J. Cebu City dengue hotspots. Cebu Daily News 2007:8.
20. Pilger D, Lenhart A, Manrique-Saide P, Siqueira JB, Da Rocha WT, Kroeger A. Is routine dengue surveillance in central Brazil able to accurately monitor the Aedes aegypti population? Results from a pupal productivity survey. Trop Med Int Health 2011;16:1143-50.
21. Ramos MM, Mohammed H, Zielinski-Gutierrez E, et al. Epidemic dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever at the Texas-Mexico Border: Results of a household-based seroepidemiologic survey, December 2005. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008;78:364-9.
22. Romero-Vivas CM, Arango-Padilla P, Falconar AK. Pupal productivity surveys to identify the key container habitats of Aedes aegypti (L.) in Barrangquilla, the principal seaport of Colombia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2006;100(suppl 1):S87-5.
23. Schoenig E. Mosquitoes in Cebu City and adjacent areas: an ecological survey. Philipp Scientist 1971;8:21-32.
24. Schoenig E. Distribution and abundance of mosquito species in Metropolitan Cebu, their relation to public health and their control. Philipp Scientist 1977;12:34-51.
25. Schoenig E. The importance of localized mosquito surveys for public health. Philipp Scientist 1978;15:96-101.
26. Seng CM, Setha T, Nealon J, Socheat D. Pupal sampling for Aedes aegypti (L.) surveillance and potential stratification of dengue highrisk areas in Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health 2009;14:1233-40.
27. Sucharit S, Tumrasvin W, Vutike S, Viraboonchai S. Interactions between larvae of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in mixed experimental populations. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1978;9:93-7.
28. Tomayao AD. People's knowledge and practice and Aedes aegypti infestation in Cebu City, Philippines and implications for community-based dengue control. Philipp Scientist 2000;37:79-93.
29. Tun-Lin W, Lenhart A, Nam VS, et al. Reducing costs and operational constraints of dengue vector control by targeting productive breeding places: a multi-country non-inferiority cluster randomized trial. Trop Med Int Health 2009;14:1143-53.
30. World Health Organization (WHO). Vector surveillance and control. Geneva: WHO, 2012. [Cited 2012 Mar. 16]. Available from: URL: www.who.int/csr/ resources/publications/dengue/048-59.pdf