Interannual variability of crop residue potential in the north central region of the United States

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 49, Issue , 2013, Pages 231-238

  Chintala, Rajesh ^a   Wimberly, Michael C ^a   Djira, Gemechis D ^b   Tulbure, Mirela G ^c  

^a SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b South Dakota State University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Crop residue; Precipitation; Spatial variability; Temperature; Temporal variability

Indexed keywords

BIO-ENERGY; BIOMASS FEEDSTOCK; CLIMATE PARAMETERS; CLIMATIC VARIABILITY; COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROP RESIDUE; CROP YIELD; GROWING SEASON; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; MEAN TEMPERATURE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; REGIONAL SCALE; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; TEMPORAL PATTERN; TEMPORAL STABILITY; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; TOTAL PRECIPITATION; YIELD POTENTIAL;

AGRICULTURE; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); TEMPERATURE;

AGRICULTURAL WASTES;

ANNUAL VARIATION; BIOENERGY; BIOMASS; BIOMASS POWER; CORRELATION; CROP RESIDUE; CROP YIELD; GROWING SEASON; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); SPATIAL VARIATION; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84873022959     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Perlack R.D., Wright L.L., Turhollow A.F., Graham R.L., Stokes B.J., Erbach D.C. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton supply 2005, Final Report, Oakridge National Laboratory, USA, Project No.: DOE/GO-102005-2135; ORNL/TM-2005/66.
2. USDOE Biomass Multi-year Program Plan April 2012 [monograph on the Internet]/Washington: 2012, [cited 2012 Aug 07]; [About 2 screens] Available from, U.S. Department of Energy. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/key_publications.html#PLANS_ROADMAPS_AND_REPORTS.
3. USDOE Vision for bioenergy and biobased products in the United States December 2006 [monograph on the Internet]/Washington: 2012, [cited 2006 Nov 05]; [About 2 screens] Available from, U.S. Department of Energy. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/key_publications.html#PLANS_ROADMAPS_AND_REPORTS.
4. USDOE-USDA Roadmap for biomass technologies in the United States October 2007 [monograph on the Internet]/Washington: 2012, [cited 2007 Nov 06]; [About 2 screens] Available from, U.S. Department of Energy. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/key_publications.html#PLANS_ROADMAPS_AND_REPORTS.
5. Bakker M.M., Govers G., Ewert F., Rounsevell M., Jones R. Variability in regional wheat yields as a function of climate, soil, and economic variables: assessing the risk of confounding. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2005, 110(3-4):195-209.
6. Rosenzweig C., Parry M.L. Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 1994, 367(6450):133-138.
7. 2 concentrations: a simulation study applying EPIC to the central USA. Agric For Meterol 1997, 83(3-4):171-203.
8. Keating B.A., Carberry P.S., Hammer G.L., Probert M.E., Robertson M.J., Hozworth D., et al. An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 2003, 18(3-4):267-288.
9. Stockle C.O., Donatelli M., Nelson R. CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. Eur J Agron 2003, 18(3-4):289-307.
10. Lobell D.B., Asner G.P. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S. agricultural yields. Science 2003, 299(5609):1032.
11. Lobell D.B., Field C.B. Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of global warming. Environ Res Lett 2007, 2:014002.
12. Kucharik C.J., Serbin S.P. Impacts of recent climate change on Wisconsin corn and soybean yield trends. Environ Res Lett 2008, 3:034003.
13. Kucharik C.J., Ramankutty N. Trends and variability in U.S. corn yields over the twentieth century. Earth Interact 2005, 9(1):1-29.
14. Williams C.L., Liebman M., Edwards J.W., James D., Singer J.W., Arritt R., et al. Patterns of regional yield stability in association with regional environmental characteristics. Crop Sci 2008, 48(4):1545-1559.
15. Humberto B.C., Lal R. Corn stover removal impacts on micro-scale soil physical properties. Geoderma 2008, 145(3):335-346.
16. Wilhelm W.W., Johnson J.M.F., Karlen D.L., Lightle D.T. Corn stover to sustain soil organic carbon further constrains biomass supply. Agron J 2007, 99(6):1665-1667.
17. Humberto B.C., Lal R. Crop residue removal impacts on soil produsctivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2009, 28(3):139-163.
18. Graham R.L., Nelson R., Sheehan J., Perlack R.D., Wright L.L. Current and potential U.S. corn stover supplies. Agron J 2007, 99(1):1-11.
19. Olsen J.E., Bocher P.K., Jensen T. Comparison of scales of climate and soil data for aggregating simulated yields of winter wheat in Denmark. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2000, 82(3):213-228.
20. NASS [Database on Internet] USDA; National Agricultural Statistical Service [cited 2012 Jan 1] Annual Data. Available from: Files updated annually. http://www.nass.usda.gov.
21. PRISM [Database on the Internet] Corvallis (OR); Oregon State University; [cited 2012 Aug 07] Monthly Data. Available from: Files updated annually. http://prism.oregonstate.edu.
22. Daly C, Gibson WP, Dogget M, Smith J, Taylor G. Up-to-date monthly climate maps for the conterminous United states. Proceedings of 14th American Meteorological Society Conference on Applied Climatology, 84th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting Combined Preprints; 13-16 Jan 2004; Seattle, USA. 2004. Paper P5.1, CD-ROM. Available from: http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/71444.pdf.
23. Milbrandt A. A geographic perspective on the current biomass resource availability in the United States 2005, Dec, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA, 70pp., Report No. NREL/TP-560-39181.
24. Kendall M.G., Stuart A. The advanced theory of statistics 1977, Hafner, New York, USA.
25. Tulbure M.G., Wimberly M.C., Boe A., Owens V. Climatic and genetic controls of yields of switchgrass, a model bioenergy species. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2012, 146(1):121-129.
26. Knapp A.K., Smith M.D. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 2001, 291(5503):481-484.
27. Tulbure M.G., Wimberly M.C., Roy D.P., Henebry G.M. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of agricultural fires in the central United States in relation to land cover and land use. Landscape Ecol 2011, 26(2):211-224.