Peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with ovarian cancer: Enhanced CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT

Clinical Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 93-97

  Kim, Hae Won ^a   Won, Kyoung Sook ^a   Zeon, Seok Kil ^a   Ahn, Byeong Cheol ^b   Gayed, Isis W ^c  

^a Keimyung University   (South Korea)

^b Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

18F FDG; enhanced CT; ovarian cancer; peritoneal carcinomatosis; PET CT

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMATOUS PERITONITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENHANCED ABDOMINAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OVARY CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; PERITONEAL NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84872961161     PISSN: 03639762     EISSN: 15360229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31826390ec     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shimada M, Kigawa J, Ohishi Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:331-334
2. Hart WR. Mucinous tumors of the ovary: A review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24:4-25 (Pubitemid 40066450)
3. Pannu HK, Bristow RE, Montz FJ, et al. Multidetector CT of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. Radiographics. 2003;23:687-701 (Pubitemid 37431249)
4. Simojoki M, Santala M, Vuopala S, et al. The prognostic value of peritoneal cytology in ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1999;20:357-360
5. Dirisamer A, Schima W, Heinisch M, et al. Detection of histologically proven peritoneal carcinomatosis with fused 18F-FDG-PET/MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:536-541
6. Husain A, Chi DS, Prasad M, et al. The role of laparoscopy in second-look evaluations for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:44-47 (Pubitemid 32062087)
7. Dromain C, Leboulleux S, Auperin A, et al. Staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Enhanced CT vs. PET/CT. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:87-93
8. Boudiaf M, Bedda S, Soyer P, et al. Preoperative evaluation of gastric adenocarcinomas: Comparison of CT results with surgical and pathologic results [in French]. Ann Chir. 1999;53:115-122 (Pubitemid 29104320)
9. Gryspeerdt S, Clabout L, Van Hoe L, et al. Intraperitoneal contrast material combined with CT for detection of peritoneal metastases of ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998;19:434-437 (Pubitemid 28479389)
10. Funicelli L, Travaini LL, Landoni F, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: The role of CT and [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35:701-707
11. Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, et al. CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: A systematic reviewand meta-Analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:164-174
12. Rose PG, Faulhaber P, Miraldi F, et al. Positive emission tomography for evaluating a complete clinical response in patients with ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma: Correlation with second-look laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82: 17-21 (Pubitemid 32634948)
13. Suzuki A,Kawano T,TakahashiN, et al.Value of 18F-FDGPETin the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1413-1420 (Pubitemid 39361938)
14. De Wever W, Ceyssens S, Mortelmans L, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: Comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:23-32 (Pubitemid 46063025)
15. Coleman RE, Delbeke D, Guiberteau MJ, et al. Concurrent PET/CT with an integrated imaging system: Intersociety dialogue from the joint working group of the American College of Radiology, the Society of Nuclear Medicine, and the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1225-1239 (Pubitemid 43741086)
16. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. Performance of integrated FDGPET/ contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: Comparison with integrated FDG-PET/nonYcontrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1439-1448
17. Sala E, Kataoka M, Pandit-Taskar N, et al. Recurrent ovarian cancer: Use of contrast-enhanced CTand PET/CT to accurately localize tumor recurrence and to predict patients' survival. Radiology. 2010;257:125-134
18. Zhang M, Jiang X, Xu H, et al. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of ascites of undetermined origin. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:506-512
19. Sanli Y, Turkmen C, Bakir B, et al. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;33:509-515
20. De Iaco P, Musto A, Orazi L, et al. FDG-PET/CT in advanced ovarian cancer staging: Value and pitfalls in detecting lesions in different abdominal and pelvic quadrants compared with laparoscopy. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:e98Ye103
21. Halvorsen RA Jr, Panushka C, Oakley GJ, et al. Intraperitoneal contrast material improves the CT detection of peritoneal metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:37-40
22. Choi HJ, Lim MC, Bae J, et al. Region-based diagnostic performance of multidetector CT for detecting peritoneal seeding in ovarian cancer patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:353-360
23. Turlakow A, Yeung HW, Salmon AS, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: Role of (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1407-1412 (Pubitemid 39663352)
24. Low RN, Barone RM, Lacey C, et al. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. Radiology. 1997;204:513-520 (Pubitemid 27337505)
25. Coakley FV, Choi PH, Gougoutas CA, et al. Peritoneal metastases: Detection with spiral CT in patients with ovarian cancer. Radiology. 2002;223:495-499 (Pubitemid 34454332)
26. Walkey MM, Friedman AC, Sohotra P, et al. CT manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:1035-1041
27. De Gaetano AM, Calcagni ML, Rufini V, et al. Imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis with FDG PET-CT: Diagnostic patterns, case examples and pitfalls. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:391-402
28. Meyers MA. Distribution of intra-Abdominal malignant seeding: Dependency on dynamics of flow of ascitic fluid. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1973;119:198-206
29. Yoo E, Kim JH, Kim MJ, et al. Greater and lesser omenta: Normal anatomy and pathologic processes. Radiographics. 2007;27:707-720