How nice is NICE?

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 116-117

  Sparrow, John M ^a  

^a BRISTOL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE FINDING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; UNITED KINGDOM; VISUAL FIELD;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; EYE DISEASES; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84872944142     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302634     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. NICE. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk (accessed 7 Nov 2012).
2. NICE. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence-Glaucoma. 2012. http://www.nice.org.uk/Search.do?searchText=GLAUCOMA&newsearch= true&x=0&y=0&page=1#/search/?reload (accessed 7 Nov 2012).
3. NICE. Glaucoma: Diagnosis and management of chronic open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. 2009. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG85/(accessed 7 Nov 2012).
4. AOP, ABDO, FODO. Advice on NICE glaucoma guidelines. 2009. http://www.assoc-optometrists.org/uploaded-files/glaucoma-advice-and-faqs-01.06. 09.pdf (accessed 25 Jun 2009).
5. Khan S, Clarke J, Kotecha A. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012;32:472-7.
6. Shah S, Murdoch IE. NICE-impact on glaucoma case detection. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011;31: 339-42.
7. Burr JM, Mowatt G, Hernández R, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2007;11:1-362. http://www.hta.ac.uk/execsumm/summ1141.shtml (accessed 7 Nov 2012).
8. NICE. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence-Glaucoma Quality Standard-QS7. 2011. http://publications.nice.org.uk/glaucoma- qualitystandard-qs7 (accessed 7 Nov 2012).
9. Ratnarajan G, Newsom W, French K, et al. Guideline publication on agreement of examination findings between professionals in an established glaucoma referral refinement pathway. The Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project. Br J Ophthalmol Published Online First: 30 October 2012. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol- 2012-302352
10. The College of Optometrists and The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Guidance on the referral of Glaucoma suspects by community optometrists. 2010. http://www.college-optometrists.org/en/utilities/document-summary.cfm?docid= B7251E0C-2436-455A-B15F1E43B6594206 (accessed 7 Nov 2012).
11. Sparrow JM. Royal College of Ophthalmologists follow up delays survey: Summary Report. 2012. http://www.rcophth.ac.uk/core/core-picker/download.asp?id= 1489 (accessed 7 Nov 2012).
12. NPSA. National Patient Safety Agency National Reporting and Learning Service Rapid Response Report: Preventing delay to follow up for patients with glaucoma. 2009. http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/alerts-and-directives/rapidrr/ glaucoma/(accessed 25 Jun 2012).
13. Sparrow JM, Kelly S, Rimmer T, et al. New to follow up (N:F) ratios in ophthalmology outpatient services. Document commissioned by the Professional Standards Committee for the Royal College of Ophthalmologists. 2011. http://www.rcophth.ac.uk/core/core-picker/download.asp?id=882 (accessed 7 Nov 2012).